Greening the Airport Landside Area: Light Rail Rapid Transit Access System

  • Milan Janić
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


Many airports worldwide, particularly large airports, are increasingly being faced with requirements relating to approval of plans for expansion of airside and landside infrastructure to accommodate the perceived traffic growth efficiently, effectively, and safely. This implies that each such expansion, in order to get approval, must be at least environmentally neutral in terms of increased local noise, emissions of greenhouse gases, airside and landside congestion, land take (use), and safety in terms of traffic incidents/accidents.


Market Share Trip Purpose Public Transport System Light Rail Transit Passenger Demand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    AUMA (2007) Towards a light rail transit program: analysis and recommendations. Alberta Urban Municipalities Association, Alberta, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    CA (2008) Fact sheet: Amsterdam remains a popular tourist destination. City of amsterdam research and statistics, Economic development department. Amsterdam, The Netherlands, p 6Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    CE (2008) Vehicle technology review: city of edmonton. LRTP Projects.
  4. 4.
    CE Delft (2008) Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector. Produced within the study internalization measures and policies foe all external cost of transport (IMPACT), CE Delft-Solutions for Environment Economy and Technology, Delft, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    EC (2009) EU Energy and Transport in Figures. Statistical pocketbook, European Commission, LuxembourgGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    EEC (2007) Standard inputs for EUROCONTROL cost benefit analysis. EUROCONTROL, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ERRAC (2004) Light rail and metro systems in Europe: current market perspectives and research implications. The European rail research advisory council, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garrett TA (2004) Light-Rail transit in America: policy issues and prospects for economic development. Federal Reserve Bank, St Louis, USAGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gosling DG (2006) Predictive Reliability of Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models. 85th Transportation research board annual meeting. Session 584, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    HGL (2002) SERAS surface access modeling. Halcrow group Ltd, Report prepared for the department of transport, Local government and the regions, South East and East of England regional air services study. London, England, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Janic M (2001) Analysis and modeling of air transport system: capacity, quality of services and economics. Gordon & Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Janic M (2009) Light rail system for more sustainable accessibility of large airports. RANSUMO (Transition to Sustainable Mobility) Research Programme, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kouwehoven M (2008) The Role of Accessibility in Passenger Choice of Airports. Discussion paper No. 2008–14. Joint transport research centre, International transport forum, Significance, The Hague, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    LFA (2000) Improving Public Transportation Access to Large Airports. Leigh Fisher Associates, MA. Coogan, and Market Sense, TCRP Report 62: TRB, National Research Council, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SG (2003/2008) Annual reports. Schiphol Group, Schiphol, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    SG (2007) Een wereldwijd netwerk voor een concurrerende randstad. Schiphol Group, Schiphol, Amsterdam, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    SN (2004) Nederlandse lijst van energiedragers en standard CO2 emissiefactoren. Senter Novem, Utrecht, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    SN (2008) Statistical yearbook 2008. Statistics Netherlands, Voorburg, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    STSI (2008) Light rail vehicles. Siemens transportation systems Inc., Rolling stock division, Sacramento, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tegner G (2004) Comparison of costs between bus, PRT, LRT and Metro/Rail in EC project European demonstration of innovative city transport (EDICT). European commission 5th framework program, DG VII, Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    TRB (2008) Ground access to major airports by public transportation. ACRP Report 4, Transportation research board, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    TRB (2008a) Airport ground access system mode choice models: a synthesis of airport practice. ACRP synthesis 5, Transportation research board, Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    VTT (2004) Transit bus emissions study: comparison of emissions from diesel and natural gas buses. Research report. Technical research center of Finland, Tampere, FinlandGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vuchic RV (2004) Urban transit: operations, planning and economics. Willey, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Transport and Planning, Faculty of Civil Engineering and GeosciencesDelft University of TechnologyCN DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations