Abstract
The parties involved in the air transport system such as airport operators, airlines, and ATC (Air Traffic Control), the systems’ regulatory bodies at both national and international level, planners and researchers (academic and consultants) have made great efforts to provide sufficient airport runway capacity to adequately serve the continually growing demand. However, these efforts have had very limited success or have even, in many cases, been unsuccessful. In addition to the growing air transport demand, the specific environmental (mainly noise) and particularly the land take (use) constraints at many large airports both in Europe and the US have prevented the full utilisation of the designed airport runway “ultimate” and “practical” capacities. The former is defined as the maximum number of atms (air transport movements) carried out at a given runway system under conditions of constant demand for service during the specified period of time, while the latter is defined as the maximum number of atms per period of time, which enables maintaining the average delay per atm within the prescribed limit(s) (one atm is one landing or one take-off). Under the continuously growing demand, these capacity constraints have caused an increasing imbalance between demand and capacity, which has increased airport airside congestion, delays, and related costs for airlines, air passengers, and air cargo shipments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreatta G, Romanin-Jacur G (1987) Aircraft flow management under congestion. Transp Sci 21(4):249–253
Blumstein A (1959) The landing capacity of a runway. Oper Res 7(1):752–763
Choroba P (2003) A vision of wake vortex research for next 20 years. Working paper, EUROCONTROL, Bretigny sur de Orge, Paris, France
Czerny AI, Forsyth P, Gillen D, Niemeier HM (2008) Airport slots: international experiences and options for reform. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Aldershot
Donahue GL, Shorttle J, Jeddi B (2008) Looking for the capacity in NGATS. On Transportation Research Board (TRB) annual meeting, Washington DC, USA, 14 Jan 2008
EC (2002) Study on competition between airports and the application of state aid rules, volume II. Air Transport Group, Canfield University, European Commission DG VII-F, Brussels, Belgium
EC (2003) Analysis of the European transport industry. European Commission–DG TREN, Final report, Brussels, Belgium
EC (2005) Optimal procedures and techniques for the improvement of approach and landing–OPTIMA, Sixth framework program, FP6-2002-Aero 1502880, Deliverable 1.2, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium
EC (2007) Gaps identification airport, TMA, En route and TBS–reduced separation minima-RESET. Deliverable D4.2, Sixth framework program, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, p 86
FAA (2004) Summary results from long-term wake turbulence measurement at San Francisco international airport. U.S. Department of transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, DOT-VNTSC-FA27-PM-04-13, Washington, DC, USA
FAA (2010). http://www.faa.gov/about/initiatives/nextgen/
Gilbo EP (1993) Airport capacity: representation estimation, optimization. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 1(3):144–153
Harris RM (1972) Models for runway capacity analysis. The MITRE Corporation technical report, MTR-4102, Rev. 2, Langley, Virginia, USA
Janic M, Tosic V (1982) Terminal airspace capacity model. Transp Res 16A(4):253–260
Janic M (2001) Air transport system analysis and modeling: capacity, quality of service and economics. Transport series books, vol 16. Taylor and Francis, UK
Janic M (2008) Towards time-based separation rules for landing aircraft. Transportation Research Record (TRB), No. 2052 Aviation, pp 79–89
Janic M (2008a) Modeling the capacity of closely-spaced parallel runways using innovative approach procedures. Transp Res C 16(6):704–730
Janic M (2009) A concept for prioritizing the aircraft operations at congested airports. Transportation Research Record (TRB), No. 2106 Aviation, pp 100–108
Newell GF (1979) Airport capacity and delays. Transp Sci 13(3):201–241
NASA (1999) Benefit estimates of terminal area productivity program technologies. NASA/CR–1999 208989. National Aeronautics and Space Administration, VA
NASA (2001) Enhancement airport capacity through safe dynamic reduction of aircraft separation: NASA’s aircraft vortex spacing system (AVOSS). National Aeronautical and Space Administration, Hampton
Odoni AR, Bowman J (1997) Existing and required modelling capabilities for evaluating ATM systems and concepts. Final report no. NAG2-997, International Centre for Air Transportation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, Boston, USA
RITA (2008) Airport statistics 2007. The Research and Technology Innovative Administration, US Department of Transportation, Washington DC. http://www.transtat.bts.gov
Robinson III JE, Davis TJ, Isaacson DR (1997) Fuzzy reasoning based sequencing of arrival aircraft in the terminal area. The American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) Guidance, Navigation, and Control Conference, New Orleans, USA, p 11
Sarpkaya T (2000) New model for vortex decay in the atmosphere. J Aircr 37(1):53–61
Shortle JF, Jeddi BG (2007) Probabilistic analysis of wake vortex hazards for landing aircraft using multilateration data. 86th TRB Conference, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, USA
Swedish WJ (1981) Upgraded airfield capacity model. The MITRE Corporation Technical Report, MTR-81W16, Vols 1 and 2. Langley, Virginia, USA
Terrab M, Odoni AR (1993) Strategic flow management in air traffic control. Oper Res 41(1):138–152
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Janić, M. (2011). Greening the Airport Airside Area I: Increasing Runway Capacity Without Increasing Airport Size. In: Greening Airports. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-658-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-658-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-657-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-658-0
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)