Abstract
Critical Infrastructures (CIs) have basic traits in common such as large-size, wide-area coverage, complexity and interconnectedness but show significant differences in detail, even when limited to physical-engineered CIs. The challenges for understanding, modeling and analyzing these systems with regard to vulnerability are immense and far away from being resolved. Approaches can be of two types, empirical and predictive, or a combination of both, as they complement each other (Johansson and Hassel 2010). By empirical investigations, previous events are studied in order to understand the behavior of CIs and the (inter)dependencies between them as well as to identify patterns, while predictive approaches aim to model the behavior of single or a group of CIs to find potential high consequence cases and non-obvious vulnerabilities.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aven T (2010) A unified framework for risk and vulnerability analysis covering both safety and security. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. doi:10.1016/j.ress2006.03.008
Dudenhoeffer DD, Permann MR, Manic M (2006) CIMS: A framework for infrastructure interdependency modeling and analysis. In: Proceedings of the 38th conference on winter simulation, Monterey, California, 2006
Eusgeld I, Kröger W (2008) Comparative evaluation of modeling and simulation technique for interdependent critical infrastructures. In: Proceedings of PSAM9, Hong Kong, 18-23 May 2008, pp. 49–57
Eusgeld I, Kröger W, Sansavini G, Schläpfer M, Zio E (2009) The role of network theory and object-oriented modeling within a framework for the vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 94:954–963. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2008.10.011
Johansson J, Hassel H (2010) An approach for modelling interdependent infrastructures in the context of vulnerability analysis. Reliab Eng Syst Safe. doi:10.1016/j.ress2010.06.010
MIA (2010) Definition of a methodology for the assessment of mutual interdependencies between ICT and electricity generation/transmission infrastructures. Final report, September 2010, Italian National Agency for New Technology, Energy and Environment, Italy
Piwowar J, Châtelet E, Laclémence P (2009) An efficient process to reduce infrastructure vulnerabilities facing malevolence. Reliab Eng Syst Safe 94:1869–1877. doi:10.1016/j.ress2009.06.009
Qu G, Rudraraju J, Modukuri R, Hariri S, Raghavendra CS (2002) A framework for network vulnerability analysis. ITL Lab, the University of Arizona, University of Sothern California
Utne IB, Hokstad P, Vatn J (2009) A structured approach to modeling interdependencies in risk analysis of critical infrastructures. In: Proceedings of the European safety and reliability conference, ESREL 2009, Prague, Czech Republic, 7–10 September 2009
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kröger, W., Zio, E. (2011). Conceptual Frameworks for Vulnerability Assessment. In: Vulnerable Systems. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-655-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-655-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-654-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-655-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)