Abstract
Previous chapters described how to choose and combine different independent variables and their conditions. When there are more than two conditions for these variables, additional statistical analysis is needed to verify which differences between conditions are significant. This chapter describes the steps that need to be taken when there are more than two conditions that are being compared with follow-up statistical tests.
Both t-tests and ANOVA can be used to conduct multiple comparisons. When t-tests are conducted, each test indicates whether a difference between two conditions is significant. However, each test carries its own risk. As a result, making multiple comparisons increases the chance of making a Type I Error - where a null hypothesis is incorrectly rejected. To avoid increasing the overall chance of making a Type I Error, a Bonferroni adjustment should be made. On the other hand, when ANOVA is conducted the omnibus F-test shows main and interaction effects. When there are more than two conditions, these significant effects by themselves do not indicate which pairs of conditions differ from each other and follow-up analysis is needed. With ANOVA, the additional analysis consists of post hoc comparisons to pinpoint the conditions where the differences are significant.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rosenthal R, Rosnow RL (1991) Essentials of behavioral research: methods and data analysis. McGraw-Hill, Boston
Fang J-Q (2005) Medical statistics and computer experiments. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Singapore
Kirk RE (1995) Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole Publishing Company, Pacific Grove
Gravetter FJ, Wallnau LB (2007) Statistics for the behavioral sciences, 7th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont
Dunn OJ (1961) Multiple comparisons among means. J Am Stat Assoc 56(293):52–64
Jin VX, Apostolos J, Nagisetty NSVR, Farnham PJ (2009) W-ChIPMotifs: a web application tool for De Novo Motif discovery from ChIP-based high-throughput data. Bioinformatics 25(23):3191–3193. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp570
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Leroy, G. (2011). Conducting Multiple Comparisons. In: Designing User Studies in Informatics. Health Informatics. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-622-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-622-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-621-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-622-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)