Advertisement

A Reuse Design Decision Support System Based on Self-Organizing Maps

  • J. Feldhusen
  • A. Nagarajah
  • S. Schubert
  • A. Brezing
Chapter

Abstract

This paper demonstrates the advantages of combining computer attributes with human attributes for useful cooperation in reuse design decision making. In this field of design, the final decision is generally made by a human, since they are better at interpreting the structure of the data than a computer, provided that the data is processed and presented in a clear and comprehensible way. A good approach to processing data is visualization, which can be performed by the data mining method Self-Organizing Maps (SOM). SOM can be used to effectively visualize the structures and connections in the available data.

Keywords

Fracture Strength Product Variant Preparation Phase Decision Phase Elementary Requirement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ankerst M (2001) Visual data mining. PhD Thesis Ludwig Maximilian Universität München, ISBN 3-89825-201-9Google Scholar
  2. Bruns K, Meyer-Wegener K (2005) Taschenbuch der Medieninformatik. Carl Hanser, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  3. Fleischmann A (2008) Modellbasierte Formalisierung von Anforderungen für eingebettete Systeme im Automotive-Bereich. GRIN, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  4. Göpfert J (2009) Modulare Produktentwicklung, Zur gemeinsamen Gestaltung von Technik und Organisation, Theorie Methodik Gestaltung. Books on Demand, NorderstedtGoogle Scholar
  5. Kamsties E (2001) Surfacing ambiguity in natural language requirements. Fraunhofer-IRB, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  6. Kohonen T (2001) Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  7. Kurbel K (1992) Entwicklung und Einsatz von Expertensystemen, Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung in wissensbasierte Systeme. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  8. Leemhuis H (2005) Funktionsgetriebene Konstruktion als Grundlage verbesserter Produktentwicklung. Dissertation, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Ong S, Xu Q, Nee A (2008) Design reuse in product development modeling, analysis and optimization. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  10. Ott S (2009) Konzept zur methodischen System-Modellierung in der anforderungsgerechten Produktentwicklung. Shaker, AachenGoogle Scholar
  11. Otte R, Otte V, Kaiser V (2004) Data Mining für die industrielle Praxis. Hanser, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  12. Rao R (2007) Decision Making in the Manufacturing Environment, Using Graph Theory and Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making Methods. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  13. Schulte S (2006) Integration von Kundenfeedback in die Produktentwicklung zur Optimierung der Kundenzufriedenheit. Shaker, AachenGoogle Scholar
  14. Winter U (2008) Automobil-Industrie: “Krise dauert bis 2010”. http://www.rp-online.de/wirtschaft/news/Krise-dauert-bis-2010_aid_639188.html. Accessed Dec 17th 2009

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Feldhusen
    • 1
  • A. Nagarajah
    • 1
  • S. Schubert
    • 1
  • A. Brezing
    • 1
  1. 1.RWTH AachenAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations