Skip to main content

Towards a Designer-Centred Methodology: Descriptive Considerations and Prescriptive Reflections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Design methodology aims to provide structure that supports designers dealing with complex and complicated problems in varying projects, contexts and environments. For decades, the technique for transferring methods into practice has been discussed, mainly in reference to the limited use of methods in practice. This paper addresses three issues: past, present, and future. ‘What is methodology good for?’ is asked in reference to the past and provides a brief overview of arguments from recent decades that question the benefits of design methodology. The second part elaborates on the claim that designers should be the source of information about their use of design methods. To support the plea for a designer-centred methodology, results are presented of an interview study that aimed to find out what kind of situations the users of design methods - the designers - experience as non-routine situations and how they cope with these kinds of situations. It is assumed that this information helps to determine when designers need what kind of support. Finally, the third section discusses the extent to which the new design thinking movement as a business strategy will influence the development of design methodology in the future, and closes with a summary of the implications of future trends for design methodology. The emphasis throughout is a plea for substantial methodological support in an individually personalised and situation–oriented manner to meet the demands of the user, and thus increase design performance.

The most innovative designers consciously reject the standard option box and cultivate an appetite for thinking wrong.

(Marty Neumeier)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Alexander C (1971) The state of the art in design methods: interview with C. Alexander. DMG newsletter:3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo C (2001) Acquisition of product development tools in industry: a theoretical contribution. Thesis technical university of Denmark, Lyngby

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub P and Frankenberger E (1999) Analysis of Design Practice. Design Studies, 1999, 20(5):465–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub P, Lloyd P, van der Lugt R, Roozenburg N (2005) Human-centered Design Methodology. In H.H. Achten, K. Dorst, P.J. Stappers, and B. de Vries (eds.) Design Research in the Netherlands 2005, Design Systems Eindhoven:23–32. Design Thinking

    Google Scholar 

  • Badke-Schaub P, Roozenburg NFM and Cardoso C (2010) A paradigm on its way from dilution to meaninglessness? Proceedings of the Design Thinking Research Symposium, October 2010, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhofer H (1993) Vom Produktvorschlag zum Produktflop – mit Planung und Methodik ins Desaster. In: Strohschneider S & von der Weth R (eds) Ja, mach nur einen Plan. Pannen und Fehlschläge – Ursachen, Beispiele, Lösungen. Huber, Bern:93–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhofer H, Kloberdanz H, Berger B and Sauer T (2002) Cleaning up design methods - describing methods completely and standardized. Proceedings of Design 2002, Dubrovnik

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkhofer H, Jänsch J and Kloberdanz H (2005) An extensive and detailed view of the application of design methods and methodology in industry. In: Samual A and Lewis W (eds) International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’05, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2008) Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, June 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantamessa M (1997) Design best practice at work; an empirical research upon the effectiveness of design support tools. In the proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’97, Tampere, Finland

    Google Scholar 

  • Chater W (1999) The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A (2):273–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Cross N (1989) Engineering design methods. John Wiley: Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Daalhuizen J, Badke-Schaub P and Batill S (2009) Dealing with uncertainty in design practice: issues for designer-centered methodology. Proceedings of the ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder W (2009) Design Engineering and needs for methodology. In: Leifer L, Novell M and Skoggstad M (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’09, Stanford, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel-Brunswik E (1948) Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable, Journal of Personality 18:108–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen F (1956) Konstruktionssystematik. VEB-Verlag Technik, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • VDI-Richtlinie 2222 (1973) Konzipieren technischer Produkte Blatt 1. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubka V (1973) Theorie der Maschinensysteme Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaensch J (2007) Akzeptanz und Anwendung von Konstruktionsmethodik im industriellen Einsatz. Analyse und Empfehlungen aus kognitionswissenschaftlicher Sicht. VDI/ Fortschritt-Berichte. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JC (1977) How my thoughts about design methods have changed during the years. Design Methods and Theories, 11:50-62

    Google Scholar 

  • Jorden W (1983) Die Diskrepanz zwischen Konstruktionspraxis und Konstruktionsmethodik. Proceedings of the ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Zürich

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesselring F (1942) Die „starke” Konstruktion. Gedanken zu einer Gestaltungslehre. VDI-Zeitschrift 86, 21/22:321–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsmann M, Buijs J and Valkenburg R (2005) Managing shared understanding in collaborative design projects. In: Samuel A and Lewis W (ed) International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’05, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood T (ed) (2009) Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value. Design Management Institute, Allworth Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin RL (2009) The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. (2010). Design Thinking. A useful myth? Core77, Accessed 16th June 2010. http://www.core77.com/blog/columns/design_thinking_a_useful_myth_16790.asp

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G and Beitz W (1977) Konstruktionslehre - Handbuch für Studium und Praxis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl G, Badke-Schaub P and Frankenberger E (1999) Historical Background and Aims of Interdisciplinary Research between Bamberg, Darmstadt and Munich. Design Studies, 20:401–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16:27–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetter R and Lindemann U (2004) The transfer of methods into industry. In: Clarkson PJ, Eckert CM (eds) Design process improvement-A review of current practice, Springer:326–343

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12:257–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reason JT (1990) Human Error. Cambridge, University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie J and Spencer L (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In Bryman A and Burgess RG (eds) Analyzing Qualitative Data. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodenacker WG (1970) Methodisches Konstruieren Konstruktionsbücher Bd 27. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Roozenburg NFM, Eekels J (1995) Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutz A (1994) Akzeptanz- und Transferfragen beim methodischen Konstruieren in der Industrie. In: Pahl G (ed), Psychologische und pädagogische Fragen beim methodischen Konstruieren. Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Koln

    Google Scholar 

  • Verganti R (2009) Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Visser W (2009) Design: one but in different forms. Design Studies, 30:187–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wögerbauer H (1943) Die Technik des Konstruierens. OldenBourg, München

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Badke-Schaub, P., Daalhuizen, J., Roozenburg, N. (2011). Towards a Designer-Centred Methodology: Descriptive Considerations and Prescriptive Reflections. In: Birkhofer, H. (eds) The Future of Design Methodology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-614-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-615-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics