Abstract
Design methodology aims to provide structure that supports designers dealing with complex and complicated problems in varying projects, contexts and environments. For decades, the technique for transferring methods into practice has been discussed, mainly in reference to the limited use of methods in practice. This paper addresses three issues: past, present, and future. ‘What is methodology good for?’ is asked in reference to the past and provides a brief overview of arguments from recent decades that question the benefits of design methodology. The second part elaborates on the claim that designers should be the source of information about their use of design methods. To support the plea for a designer-centred methodology, results are presented of an interview study that aimed to find out what kind of situations the users of design methods - the designers - experience as non-routine situations and how they cope with these kinds of situations. It is assumed that this information helps to determine when designers need what kind of support. Finally, the third section discusses the extent to which the new design thinking movement as a business strategy will influence the development of design methodology in the future, and closes with a summary of the implications of future trends for design methodology. The emphasis throughout is a plea for substantial methodological support in an individually personalised and situation–oriented manner to meet the demands of the user, and thus increase design performance.
The most innovative designers consciously reject the standard option box and cultivate an appetite for thinking wrong.
(Marty Neumeier)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alexander C (1971) The state of the art in design methods: interview with C. Alexander. DMG newsletter:3–7
Araujo C (2001) Acquisition of product development tools in industry: a theoretical contribution. Thesis technical university of Denmark, Lyngby
Badke-Schaub P and Frankenberger E (1999) Analysis of Design Practice. Design Studies, 1999, 20(5):465–480
Badke-Schaub P, Lloyd P, van der Lugt R, Roozenburg N (2005) Human-centered Design Methodology. In H.H. Achten, K. Dorst, P.J. Stappers, and B. de Vries (eds.) Design Research in the Netherlands 2005, Design Systems Eindhoven:23–32. Design Thinking
Badke-Schaub P, Roozenburg NFM and Cardoso C (2010) A paradigm on its way from dilution to meaninglessness? Proceedings of the Design Thinking Research Symposium, October 2010, Sydney
Birkhofer H (1993) Vom Produktvorschlag zum Produktflop – mit Planung und Methodik ins Desaster. In: Strohschneider S & von der Weth R (eds) Ja, mach nur einen Plan. Pannen und Fehlschläge – Ursachen, Beispiele, Lösungen. Huber, Bern:93–104
Birkhofer H, Kloberdanz H, Berger B and Sauer T (2002) Cleaning up design methods - describing methods completely and standardized. Proceedings of Design 2002, Dubrovnik
Birkhofer H, Jänsch J and Kloberdanz H (2005) An extensive and detailed view of the application of design methods and methodology in industry. In: Samual A and Lewis W (eds) International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’05, Melbourne
Brown T (2008) Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review, June 2008
Brown T (2009) Change by design: how design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business, NY
Cantamessa M (1997) Design best practice at work; an empirical research upon the effectiveness of design support tools. In the proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’97, Tampere, Finland
Chater W (1999) The search for simplicity: A fundamental cognitive principle. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A (2):273–302
Cross N (1989) Engineering design methods. John Wiley: Chichester
Daalhuizen J, Badke-Schaub P and Batill S (2009) Dealing with uncertainty in design practice: issues for designer-centered methodology. Proceedings of the ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Stanford, CA
Eder W (2009) Design Engineering and needs for methodology. In: Leifer L, Novell M and Skoggstad M (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’09, Stanford, CA
Frenkel-Brunswik E (1948) Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable, Journal of Personality 18:108–143
Hansen F (1956) Konstruktionssystematik. VEB-Verlag Technik, Berlin
VDI-Richtlinie 2222 (1973) Konzipieren technischer Produkte Blatt 1. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf
Hubka V (1973) Theorie der Maschinensysteme Springer, Berlin
Jaensch J (2007) Akzeptanz und Anwendung von Konstruktionsmethodik im industriellen Einsatz. Analyse und Empfehlungen aus kognitionswissenschaftlicher Sicht. VDI/ Fortschritt-Berichte. VDI-Verlag, Düsseldorf
Jones JC (1977) How my thoughts about design methods have changed during the years. Design Methods and Theories, 11:50-62
Jorden W (1983) Die Diskrepanz zwischen Konstruktionspraxis und Konstruktionsmethodik. Proceedings of the ICED International Conference on Engineering Design, Zürich
Kesselring F (1942) Die „starke” Konstruktion. Gedanken zu einer Gestaltungslehre. VDI-Zeitschrift 86, 21/22:321–330
Kleinsmann M, Buijs J and Valkenburg R (2005) Managing shared understanding in collaborative design projects. In: Samuel A and Lewis W (ed) International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’05, Melbourne
Lockwood T (ed) (2009) Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation, Customer Experience, and Brand Value. Design Management Institute, Allworth Press, NY
Martin RL (2009) The Design of Business: Why Design Thinking is the Next Competitive Advantage. Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA
Norman, D. (2010). Design Thinking. A useful myth? Core77, Accessed 16th June 2010. http://www.core77.com/blog/columns/design_thinking_a_useful_myth_16790.asp
Pahl G and Beitz W (1977) Konstruktionslehre - Handbuch für Studium und Praxis. Springer, Berlin
Pahl G, Badke-Schaub P and Frankenberger E (1999) Historical Background and Aims of Interdisciplinary Research between Bamberg, Darmstadt and Munich. Design Studies, 20:401–406
Staw BM (1976) Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16:27–44
Stetter R and Lindemann U (2004) The transfer of methods into industry. In: Clarkson PJ, Eckert CM (eds) Design process improvement-A review of current practice, Springer:326–343
Sweller J (1988) Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12:257–285
Reason JT (1990) Human Error. Cambridge, University Press
Ritchie J and Spencer L (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In Bryman A and Burgess RG (eds) Analyzing Qualitative Data. Taylor & Francis
Rodenacker WG (1970) Methodisches Konstruieren Konstruktionsbücher Bd 27. Springer, Berlin
Roozenburg NFM, Eekels J (1995) Product Design: Fundamentals and Methods. John Wiley & Sons
Rutz A (1994) Akzeptanz- und Transferfragen beim methodischen Konstruieren in der Industrie. In: Pahl G (ed), Psychologische und pädagogische Fragen beim methodischen Konstruieren. Verlag TÜV Rheinland, Koln
Verganti R (2009) Design Driven Innovation: Changing the Rules of Competition by Radically Innovating What Things Mean, Harvard Business School, Cambridge, MA
Visser W (2009) Design: one but in different forms. Design Studies, 30:187–222
Wögerbauer H (1943) Die Technik des Konstruierens. OldenBourg, München
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Badke-Schaub, P., Daalhuizen, J., Roozenburg, N. (2011). Towards a Designer-Centred Methodology: Descriptive Considerations and Prescriptive Reflections. In: Birkhofer, H. (eds) The Future of Design Methodology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-615-3_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-614-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-615-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)