Skip to main content

Physics of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy—Commissioning, Quality Assurance, and Treatment Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy

Abstract

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have gained wide spread use as a modality of treatment in Radiation Oncology during the last decade. In this chapter, we describe various devices that are capable of delivering SBRT. These systems are complex combinations of treatment and imaging capabilities. Therefore, they require substantial efforts in commissioning and clinical validation before being used for patient treatment. We present a broad overview of commissioning whilst emphasizing the complexity of small field dosimetry. In addition, Treatment Planning System (TPS) commissioning is also discussed. Clinical validation of TPS, SBRT and Imaging systems must be validated both by performing end-to-end measurements and also by using third party (for example, Radiological Physics Center (RPC) phantoms and systems) before using the system clinically. Routine quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) is an important aspect of this treatment modality and must be strictly maintained to ensure stringent quality requirements. In addition, some systems provide patient specific QA options which further assists in ensuring high quality treatment delivery. Finally we review a variety of scenarios where SBRT may be used, demonstrating the ability to deliver high doses to the tumor whilst significantly sparing surrounding organs at risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Klein EE, Harley J, Yin F, Simon W, Dresser S, Serago C, Aguirre F, Ma L, Ajomandy B, Liu C, Sandin C, Holmes T. Task Group 142 report: quality assurance of medical accelerators. Med Phys. 2009;36:4192–212.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, Galvin JM, Hinson W, Kavanagh B, Keall P, Lovelock M, Meeks S, Papiez L, Purdie T, Sadagopan R, Schell MC, Salter B, Schlesinger DJ, Shiu AS, Song DY, Stieber V, Timmerman R, Tome WA, Verellen D, Wang L, Yin F. Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys. 2010;37(8):4078–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Das IJ, Cheng C, Watts R, Ahnesjo A, Gibbons J, Li XA, Lowenstein J, Mitra R, Simon W, Zhu TC. Accelerator beam data commissioning equipment and procedures: report of the TG-106 of the Therapy Physics Committee of the AAPM. Med Phys. 2008;35:4186–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fraass B, Doppke K, Hunt M, Kutcher G, Starkschall G, Stern R, Van Dyke J. AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee Task Group 53: quality assurance for clinical radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 1998;25:1773–829.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sharma SC, Ott JT, Williams JB, Dickow D. Commissioning and acceptance testing of a Cyberknife linear accelerator. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2007;8:119–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Sauer O, Wilbert J. Measurement of output factors for small photon beams. Med Phys. 2007;34:1983–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhu XR, Allen JJ, Shi J, Simon WE. Total scatter factors and tissue maximum ratios for small radiosurgery fields: comparison of diode detectors, a parallel-plate ion chamber, and radiographic film. Med Phys. 2000;27:472–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Francescon P, Cora S, Cavedon C. Total scatter factors of small beams: a multidetector and Monte Carlo Study. Med Phys. 2008;35:504–13.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Li S, Rashid A, He S, Dajajaputra D. A new approach in dose measurement and error analysis for narrow photon beams (beamlets) shaped by different multileaf collimators using a small detector. Med Phys. 2004;31:2020–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin F, Zhu J, Yan H, Gaun H, Hammoud R, Ryu S, Kim JH. Dosimetric characteristics of Novalis shaped beam surgery unit. Med Phys. 2002;29:1729–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Solberg TD, Medin PM, Mullins J, Li S. Quality assurance of immobilization and target localization systems for frameless stereotactic cranial and extracranial hypofractionated radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S131–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bissonnette JP, Balter PA, Dong L, Langen KM, Lovelock DM, Miften M, Moseley DJ, Pouliot J, Ramsey CR, Sonke JJ, Yoo S. Quality assurance for image-guided radiation therapy utilizing CT-based technologies: general principles report of the AAPM TG-179 (in press).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Shah AP, Kupelian PA, Willoughby TW, Meeks SL. Expanding the use of real-time electromagnetic tracking in radiation oncology. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12(4):3590.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Becker S. Collision indicator charts for gantry-couch position combinations for Varian linacs. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12(3):3405.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stasi M, Baiotta B, Barboni G, Scielzo G. The behavior of several microionization chambers in small intensity modulated radiotherapy fields. Med Phys. 2004;31:2792–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading: Quality Assurance

  1. Balter JM, Antonuk LE. Quality assurance for kilo- and megavoltage in-room imaging and localization for off and online setup error correction. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S48–52.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bissonnette JP. Quality assurance of image-guidance technologies. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2007;17:278–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bissonnette JP, Moseley D, White E, Sharpe M, Purdie T, Jaffray DA. Quality assurance for the geometric accuracy of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bissonnette JP, Moseley DJ, Jaffray DA. A quality assurance program for image quality of cone-beam CT guidance in radiation therapy. Med Phys. 2008;35:1807–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dieterich S, Sherouse GW. Experimental comparison of seven commercial dosimetry diodes for measurement of stereotactic radiosurgery cone factors. Med Phys. 2011;38:4166–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dieterich S, et al. Report of AAPM TG 135: quality assurance for robotic radiosurgery. Med Phys. 2011;38:2914–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Galvin JM, Bednarz G. Quality assurance procedures for stereotactic body radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S122–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Goetsch SJ. Linear accelerator and gamma knife-based stereotactic cranial radiosurgery: challenges and successes of existing quality assurance guidelines and paradigms. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S118–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Langen KM, Meeks SL, Pouliot J. Quality assurance of onboard megavoltage computed tomography imaging and target localization systems for on- and off-line image-guided radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:S62–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Medin PM, Verellen D. Novalis. In: Slotman BJ, Solberg TD, Verellen D, editors. Extracranial stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery. CRC Press, New York; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Saw CB, Yang Y, Li F, Yue NJ, Ding C, Komanduri K, Huq S, Heron DE. Performance characteristics and quality assurance aspects of kilovoltage cone-beam CT on medical linear accelerator. Med Dosim. 2007;32:80–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharpe MB, Moseley DJ, Purdie TG, Islam M, Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. The stability of mechanical calibration for a kV cone beam computed tomography system integrated with linear accelerator. Med Phys. 2006;33:136–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yoo S, Kim GY, Hammoud R, Elder E, Pawlicki T, Guan H, Fox T, Luxton G, Yin FF, Munro P. A quality assurance program for the on-board imagers. Med Phys. 2006;33:4431–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading List: Treatment Planning

  1. Keall P, Mageras GS, Balter JM, Emery RS, Forster KM, Jiang SB, Kapatoes JM, Kubo HD, Low DA, Murphy MJ, Murray BR, Ramsey CR, Van Herk MB, Vedam SS, Wong JW, Yorke E. The management of respiratory motion in radiation oncology: report of AAPM Task Group 76. Med Phys. 2006;33(10):3874–900.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John A. Rossman MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chuang, C.F., D’Souza, M.F., Rossman, J.A. (2015). Physics of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy—Commissioning, Quality Assurance, and Treatment Planning. In: Gaya, A., Mahadevan, A. (eds) Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-597-2_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-597-2_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-596-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-597-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics