Robotic Hands



One of the main objectives of the robotic is to make the systems able to interact, modify, transmit and receive information from the human environment. They reach the possibility to replace the human being in simple and basic functions with better results. In this way, robotic hands play a relevant role since they can perform different tasks, such as holding and manipulating, reaching visual communication and obtaining direct contact with the environment, interacting and even modifying it. When we refer to robotic hands the first thing that comes up to our mind is a robotic system that tries to imitate, in the closest way, the skills and shapes that human hands have. There are many different robotic hands and each of them marks a determined improvement in a specific aspect, due to new technology used in its development, since it has been designed from an innovative mechanic system or mechanism. Technology and mechanics applied to robotics help in improving faster. These two concepts, as it is going to be detailed in this Chapter, must be closely related because the efficient use of one of them depends on the improvement of the other. Basing in our classification, it is possible to divide robotic hands in to two types: the multi-actuated robotic hands, directed by technology and helped by special mechanisms, and the underactuated robotic hands, focused on complex and innovative mechanic systems. The second classification adds a new system concept that allows generating several and independent tasks fulfilled with only one actuator, referring to a new generation of robotic hands able to manipulate in a more dextrous way. In this Chapter, robotic hands will be analysed from its technological and mechanical aspects. First, there will be a brief explanation of robotic hands that have incorporated innovative mechanisms or new technology. Afterwards, the Chapter will focus on functional problems that can be found in the robotic hands development. Finally, some solutions will be detailed through mechanical systems and how they can affect the development of new robotic hands, studying the case of underactuated architectures.


Robotic System Humanoid Robot Human Hand Energy Transformer Design Philosophy 


  1. Ambrose R, Aldridge H, Askew R, Burridge R, Bluethmann W, Diftler M, Lovchik C, Magruder D, Rehnmark F (2000) Robonaut: NASA’s space humanoid. IEEE Intell Syst Appl 15Google Scholar
  2. Balaguer C, Giménez A, Jardón A, Correal R, Cabas R, Staroverov P (2003) Light weight autonomous robot for elderly and disabled persons’ service. Int Conf Field Serv RobGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaguer C, Giménez A, Jardón A, Cabas R, Correal R (2005) Live experimentation of the service robot applications elderly people care in home environments. IEEE Int Conf Intell Rob SystGoogle Scholar
  4. Biagiotti L, Lotti F, Melchiorri C, Vassura G (2003a) An integrated approach to the design of complex robotic end-effectors. IEEE/ASME Int Conf Adv Int Mechatron 1:70–75Google Scholar
  5. Biagiotti L, Lotti F, Melchiorri C, Vassura G (2003b) Mechatronic design of innovative fingers for anthropomorphic robot hands. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 3:3187–3192Google Scholar
  6. Biagiotti L, Lott F, Melchiorri C, Vassura G, Tiezzi P (2004) UBH 3: an anthropomorphic hand with simplified endo-skeletal structure and soft continuous fingerpads. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 5:4736–4741Google Scholar
  7. Birglen L, Laliberté T, Gosselin C (2008) Underactuated Robotic Hand. Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics (STAR), SpringerGoogle Scholar
  8. Bluethmann W, Ambrose R, Diftler M, Askew S, Huber E, Goza M, Rhenmark F, Lovchik C, Magruder D (2003) Robonaut: A Robot Designed to Work with Humans in Space. Auton Rob 14:179–197MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bologni L, Caselli S, Melchiorri C (1988) Design Issues for the U.B. Robotic Hand. Advanced Research Workshop ARW: Robots with Redundancy: Design, Sensing and ControlGoogle Scholar
  10. Bonivento C, Faldella E, Vassura G (1991) The University of Bologna Robotic Hand Project: current state and future developments. IEEE Fifth Int Con Adv Rob 1:349–356Google Scholar
  11. Borst C, Fischer Haidacher S, Liu H, Hirzinger G (2003) DLR hand II: experiments and experience with an anthropomorphic hand. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 1:702–707Google Scholar
  12. Butterfass J, Grebenstein M, Liu H, Hirzinger G (2001) DLR-Hand II: next generation of a dextrous robot hand. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 1:109–114Google Scholar
  13. Butterfass J, Fischer M, Grebenstein M, Haidacher S, Hirzinger G (2004) Design and experiences with DLR hand II. World Autom Congr 15:105–110Google Scholar
  14. Cabás R, Balaguer C (2005) Design and development of a light weight embodied robotic hand activated with only one actuator. IEEE Int Conf Intell Rob SystGoogle Scholar
  15. Cabás R, Cabás LM, Balaguer C (2006) Optimized design of the underactuated robotic hand. IEEE Int Conf Rob AutomGoogle Scholar
  16. Correal R, Jardón A, Cabas R, Giménez A, Balaguer C (2005) Asibot, robot de asistencia a discapacitados y personas mayores. Congreso Internacional sobre Domótica, Robótica y TeleasistenciaGoogle Scholar
  17. Correal R, Jardón A, Martínez S, Cabas R, Giménez A, Balaguer C (2006) Human-Robot Coexistence in Robot-Aided Apartment. International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in ConstructionGoogle Scholar
  18. Data Sheet of the Barrett Hand (2008) Barrett Technology IncGoogle Scholar
  19. Eusebi A, Fantuzzi C, Melchiorri C, Sandri M, Tonielli A (1994) The UB Hand II control system: design features and experimental results. Int Conf Ind Electron, Control Instrum 2:782–787Google Scholar
  20. Giménez A, Balaguer C (2003) The MATS robotic system to assist disabled people in their home environments. IEEE Int Conf Intell Rob SystGoogle Scholar
  21. Giménez A, Jardón A, Correal R, Cabas R, Balaguer C (2004) Service robot applications for elederly people care in home environments. International workshop on advances in service roboticsGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirzinger G, Brunner B, Dietrich J, Heindi J (1994) ROTEX: The First Remotely Controlled Robot in Space. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 3:2604–2611Google Scholar
  23. Jau B (1994) Feasibility analysis of performing EVA tasks with dextrous robots. JPL IOM 3474-94-007Google Scholar
  24. Jau B (1995) Dexterous telemanipulation with four fingered hand system. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 1:338–343Google Scholar
  25. Kawasaki H, Komatsu T (1998) Development of an anthropomorphic robot hand driven by built-in servo-motors. Int Conf ICAM 1:215–220Google Scholar
  26. Kawasaki H, Komatsu T (1999) Mechanism design of antropomorphic robot hand: GIFU Hand I. J Rob Mechatron 11:269–273Google Scholar
  27. Kawasaky H, Komatsu T, Uchiyama K (2002) Dexterous anthropomorphic robot hand with distributed tactile sensor - Gifu hand II. IEEE-ASME Trans Mechatron 7:296–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu H, Meusel P, Hirzinger G (1995) A tactile sensing system for the DLR three-finger robot hand. IMEKO Technical Committee on Robotics 91-96Google Scholar
  29. Lotti F, Vassura G (2002) A novel approach to mechanical design of articulated fingers for robotic hands. IEEE Int Conf Intell Rob and Syst 2:1687–1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lotti F, Tiezzi P, Vassura G (2004) UBH 3: investigating alternative design concepts for robotic hands. IEEE World Autom Congr 15:135–140Google Scholar
  31. Lotti F, Tiezzi P, Vassura G, Biagiotti L, Palli G, Melchiorri C (2005) Development of UB Hand 3: Early Results. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 4488-4493Google Scholar
  32. Lovchik C, Diftler M (1999) The Robonaut Hand: A dextrous robot hand for space. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 2:907–912Google Scholar
  33. Melchiorri C, Vassura G (1992) Mechanical And Control Features Of The University Of Bologna Hand Version 2. IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Rob Syst 187-193Google Scholar
  34. Mouri T, Kawasaki H, Yoshikawa K, Takai J, Ito S (2002) Anthropomorphic robot hand: GIFU Hand III. Int Conf Control, Autom Syst 1288-1293Google Scholar
  35. Mouri T, Kawasaki H, Umebayashi K (2005) Developments of New Anthropomorphic Robot Hand and its Master Slave System. IEEE Int Conf Intell Rob Syst 3225-3230Google Scholar
  36. Namiki A, Imai Y, Ishikawa M, Kanek M (2003) Development of a High-speed Multifingered Hand System and Its Application to Catching. IEEE Int Conf Intell Rob Syst 2666-2671Google Scholar
  37. Reichel M, Company TSR (2004) Transformation of Shadow Dextrous Hand and Shadow Finger Test Unit from Prototype to Product for Intelligent Manipulation and Grasping. International Conference on Intelligent Manipulation and GraspingGoogle Scholar
  38. Rothling F, Haschke R, Steil J, Ritter H (2007) Platform portable anthropomorphic grasping with the bielefeld 20-DOF shadow and 9-DOF TUM hand. IEEE/RSJ Int Conf Intell Robots and Syst 2951-2956Google Scholar
  39. Schultz S, Pylatiuk C, Bretthauer G (1999) A new class of flexible fluidic actuators and their applications in medical engineering. Automatisierungstechnik 47:390–395Google Scholar
  40. Schultz S, Pylatiuk C, Bretthauer G (2001) A new ultralight anthropomorphic hand. IEEE Int Conf Rob Autom 3:2437–2441Google Scholar
  41. Shadow Dextrous Hand C5: Technical Specificaction (2007) Shadow Robot Company, LtdGoogle Scholar
  42. Townsend WT (2000) MCB - Industrial robot feature articule - Barrett Hand Grasper. Ind Robot: An Int J 27(3):181–188MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Walker R (2003) Design of a Dextrous Hand for advanced CLAWAR applications. CLAWAR International Conference on Climbing and Walking RobotsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Robotics LabCarlos III UniversityLeganés, MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations