DSM Enhancements

  • Arie Karniel
  • Yoram Reich


The following section presents the proposed process for gathering DSM data. As in other DSM-based process planning methods, the product data is deriving the process plan. A key issue in the current work is the utilization of data changes throughout the design process. The detailing level is not pre-defined and is changing and adapting to the applicable product knowledge. Collecting the data throughout the design process requires a tool. An existing applicable tool could be a PLM product, where other product relation links (e.g., father-son) are managed. A specific tool for collecting the data may also apply but would be less effective. The process of collecting the DSM data as part of the overall DnPDP is fully described in  Sect. 8.5. The following example reflects the initial knowledge at the conceptual design stage.


Design Activity Quality Function Deployment Activity Loop Forward Link Reachability Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Browning TR, Eppinger SD (2002) Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 49(4):428–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Browning TR, Fricke E, Negele H (2006) Key concepts in modeling product development processes. Sys Eng 9(2):104–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cho SH, Eppinger SD (2001) Product development process modeling using advanced simulation. ASME Conference on design theory and methodology (DECT 2001/DTM), Pittsburgh, PA, SeptemberGoogle Scholar
  4. Danilovic M, Browning TR (2007) Managing complex product development projects with design structure matrices and domain mapping matrices. Int J Project Manag 25(3):300–314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DSM web site (2009) Accessed July 2010
  6. Eckert CM, Keller R, Earl C, Clarkson PJ (2006) Supporting change processes in design: Complexity, prediction and reliability. Reliab Eng Saf Sys 91(12):1521–1534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eppinger SD, Salminen V (2001) Patterns of product development interactions. International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED 01, Glasgow, Aug. 21–23Google Scholar
  8. Huberman BA, Wilkinson DM (2005) Performance variability and project dynamics. Comput Math Organiz Theor 11:307–332MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Karniel A, Belsky Y, Reich Y (2005) Decomposing the problem of constrained surface fitting in reverse engineering. Comput-Aided Des 37:399–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Karniel A, Reich Y (2007a) Simulating design processes with self-iteration activities based on DSM planning. IEEE Proceedings of the international conference on systems engineering and modeling ICSEM’07 33–41, Haifa, MarchGoogle Scholar
  11. Karniel A, Reich Y (2007b) Managing dynamic new product development processes. Proceedings of the 17th annual international symposium of the international council on system engineering INCOSE’07, San Diego, California, JuneGoogle Scholar
  12. Karniel A, Reich Y (2011) Formalizing the implementation of DSM-based process planning for NPD. IEEE Tran on Sys Man & Cybernetics, Part A 41(3):476–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lester I (1996) Adaptive simulated annealing (ASA): lessons learned. J Control Cybern 25(1):35–54Google Scholar
  14. Maurer M (2007) Structural Awareness in complex product design. Dissertation, Technischen Universität München, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  15. Reich Y, Fenves SJ (1992) Inductive learning of synthesis knowledge. Int J Expert Syst: Res App 5(4):275–297Google Scholar
  16. Rogers JL, Bloebaum CL (1994) Ordering design tasks based on coupling strengths. AIAA, paper no. 94-4326Google Scholar
  17. Sered Y, Reich Y (2006) Standardization and modularization driven by minimizing overall process effort. Comput Aided Des 38(5):405–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1997a) Identifying controlling features of engineering design iteration. Manag Sci 43(3):276–293MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith RP, Eppinger SD (1997b) A predictive model of sequential iteration in engineering design. Manag Sci 43(8):1104–1120MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yassine A (2007) Investigating product development process reliability and robustness using simulation. J Eng Des 18(6):545–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yassine A, Joglekar N, Braha D, Eppinger SD, Whitney D (2003) Information hiding in product development: The design churn effect. Res Eng Des 14(3):131–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations