Dynamic Changes



The presented framework engaged three levels of dynamics: the process level (process dynamics within a predefined scheme), the process scheme level (run time changes of the process scheme), and the BR level (decision-making model, i.e., changing the way that process scheme changes are implemented). Using the dynamic process changes classification definitions, in  Sect. 2.3, the implementation of the following dynamic levels (Fig.  2.5) is further elaborated (Fig. 11.1):
Fig. 11.1

Dynamic scheme change types


Process Scheme Design Activity Logic Activity Activity Duration Business Rule 


  1. Asmussen S, Glynn PW (2007) Stochastic simulation algorithms and analysis. Springer, BerlinMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho SH, Eppinger SD (2005) A simulation-based process model for managing complex design projects. IEEE Trans on Eng Manag 52(3):316–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Karniel A, Reich Y (2007) From planning to executing NPD processes. In the 4th Annual Israeli National Conference on System Engineering—INCOSE_IL’07, HerzliyaGoogle Scholar
  4. Karniel A, Reich Y (2009) Statistical analysis of process simulations. In: International conference on engineering design (ICED’ 09), Stanford, CAGoogle Scholar
  5. Reich Y, Paz A (2008) Managing product quality, risk, and resources through quality function deployment. J Eng Design 19(3):249–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Russell N, van der Aalst WMP, Hofstede AH ter (2006) Exception handling patterns in process-aware information systems. In: The 18th Conference Advanced Inf. Systems Engineering CAiSE’06Google Scholar
  7. Verbeek HMW, Basten T, van der Aalst WMP (2001) Diagnosing workflow processes using Woflan. Comput J 44(4):246–279MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited  2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mechanical EngineeringTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations