Abstract
Syngas final usage requires a previous step of cleaning and conditioning to meet with the requirements of its final use which might range from chemicals and fuels production to power and/or heat. This chapter deals with the description and the modelling of the required syngas treatment units before electricity production or before hydrogen generation, specifically in an IGCC power plant. In the case of electricity generation application, the pursued objective is to avoid as much as possible nitrogen and sulphur oxide emissions to the atmosphere. In a first step, the gas is cleaned from solids. Secondly the gas before its combustion goes through an acid and basic species removal train of units. In the case of hydrogen generation, besides syngas cleaning from other species, the main pursued objective is to separate CO from H2. In order to accomplish the former, CO should be converted into CO2 and then separated from the main stream. Hydrogen can be further purified to be sold to the market, or used in a combined cycle, in an analogous way as the syngas. Modelling calibration and validation are shown, and the chapter finishes with a model utilisation to evaluate the behaviour of the already built up superstructure to produce hydrogen or syngas for electricity generation section, or hydrogen for other applications.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Abbreviations
- ASU:
-
Air separation unit
- CC:
-
Combined cycle
- CCS:
-
Carbon capture and storage
- CGE:
-
Cold gas efficiency
- COE:
-
Cost of energy
- DMPEG:
-
Dimethyl ethers of polyethylene glycol
- ELECNRTL:
-
Non-random two liquid with electrolytes formation
- EOS:
-
Equation of state
- FT:
-
Fischer–Tropsch process
- GHG:
-
Greenhouse gases
- GT:
-
Gas turbine
- GTL:
-
Gas to liquid fuels
- HP:
-
High pressure
- HRSG:
-
Heat recovery steam generator
- IGCC:
-
Integrated gasification combined cycle
- IP:
-
Intermediate pressure
- LHV:
-
Lower heating value
- MCFC:
-
Molten carbonate fuel cells
- MDEA:
-
Methyl diethyl ethanol amine
- NRTL:
-
Non-random two liquid
- PEM:
-
Proton exchange membranes
- PSA:
-
Pressure swing adsorption
- SOFC:
-
Solid oxide fuel cell
- ST:
-
Steam turbine
- TIT:
-
Turbine inlet temperature
- VLE:
-
Vapor–liquid equilibrium
- WGS:
-
Water gas shift
- WHB:
-
Waste heat boiler
References
Demirbas MF (2009) Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: a critical review. Appl Energ 86:S151–S161
Wang L, Weller CL, Jones DD, Hanna MA (2008) Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production. Biomass Bioenerg 32:573–581
Highman C, van der Burght M (2003) Gasification. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
BTG Biomass Gasification (2008). Technical report, Biomass Technology Group (BTG), The Netherlands. http://www.btgworld.com/uploads/documents/Gasification%20Attachment%20Website%20v2.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2010
Bang-Moller C, Rokni M (2010) Thermodynamic performance study of biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid systems. Energ Convers Manage 51:2330–2339
Hernández-Pacheco E, Mann MD, Hutton PN, Singh D, Martin KE (2005) A cell-level model for a solid oxide fuel cell operated with syngas from a gasification process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:1221–1233
Wender I (1996) Reactions of synthesis gas. Fuel Process Technol 48:189–297
Watson GH (1980) Methanation catalysts, report number ICTIS/TR09, Feb 1980. IEA Coal Research, London
Gassner M, Maréchal F (2009) Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenerg 33:1587–1604
Separation processes, Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, processes and process engineering (2004). Volume 1, Wiley-VCH Ed
Sharma SD, Dolan M, Park D, Morpeth L, Ilyushechkin A, McLennan K, Harris DJ, Thambimuthu KV (2008) A critical review of syngas cleaning technologies: fundamental limitations and practical problems. Powder Technol 180:115–121
Pisa J, Serra de Renobales L, Moreno A, Valero A (1997) Evaluación de alternativas en un diseño de planta GICC con gasificador PRENFLO. XII Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Mecánica.
Brown D, Gassner M, Fuchino T, Maréchal F (2009) Thermo-economic analysis for the optimal conceptual design of biomass gasification energy conversion systems. Appl Therm Eng 29:2137–2152
Arena U, Zaccariello L, Matellone ML (2010) Fluidized bed gasification of waste-derived fuels. Waste Manage 30:1212–1219
IEA-GHG (2008) Co-production of hydrogen and electricity by coal gasification with CO2 capture updated economic analysis. Technical report, UK.
Metz B, Davidson O, Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, Chapter 3. IPCC, Switzerland
Huang Y, Rezvani S, McIlveen-Wright D, Minchener A, Hewitt N (2008) Techno-economic study of CO2 capture and storage in coal fired oxygen fed entrained flow IGCC power plants. Fuel Process Technol 89:916–925
Desideri U, Paolucci A (1999) Performance modelling of a carbon dioxide removal system for power plants. Energy Convers Manage 40:1899–1915
Hamelinck CN, Faaij APC (2002) Future propects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J Power Sources 111:1–22
Kanniche M, Bouallou C (2007) CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 27:2693–2702
Descamps C, Bouallou C, Kanniche M (2008) Efficiency of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal. Energy 33:874–881
Chen C, Rubin E (2009) CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost. Energy Policy 37:915–924
Biagini E, Masoni L, Tognotti L (2010) Comparative study of thermochemical processes for hydrogen production from biomass fuels. Bioresour Technol 101:6381–6388
Cormos CC, Cormos A-M, Agachi S (2009) Power generation from coal and biomass based on integrated gasification combined cycle concept with pre- and post- combustion carbon capture methods. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 4:870–877
Kanniche M, Gros-Bonnivard R, Jaud P, Valle-Marcos J, Amann J-M, Bouallou C (2010) Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture. Appl Therm Eng 30:53–62
Prausnitz JM, Lichtenthaler RN, Gomez de Acevedo E (1986) Molecular thermodynamics of fluid-phase equilibria, 2nd edn. PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 269–278
AspenTech Incorporation (2010) Aspen Plus user’s guide. http://support.aspentech.com Accessed 20 Sept 2010
Pérez-Fortes M, Bojarski AD, Velo E, Puigjaner L (2010) IGCC power plants: conceptual design and techno-economic optimization. In: Clean energy: resources, production and developments. Energy science, engineering and technology. NOVA, NY
Chiesa P, Consonni S, Kreutz T, Williams R (2005) Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: performance and emissions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:747–767
Wells GL, Rose LM (1986) The art of chemical process design. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Mastellone ML, Zaccariello L, Arena U (2010) Co-gasification of coal, plastic waste and wood in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Fuel 89:2991–3000
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pérez-Fortes, M., Bojarski, A.D. (2011). Main Purification Operations. In: Puigjaner, L. (eds) Syngas from Waste. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-540-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-540-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-539-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-540-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)