Skip to main content

Main Purification Operations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Syngas from Waste

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 1664 Accesses

Abstract

Syngas final usage requires a previous step of cleaning and conditioning to meet with the requirements of its final use which might range from chemicals and fuels production to power and/or heat. This chapter deals with the description and the modelling of the required syngas treatment units before electricity production or before hydrogen generation, specifically in an IGCC power plant. In the case of electricity generation application, the pursued objective is to avoid as much as possible nitrogen and sulphur oxide emissions to the atmosphere. In a first step, the gas is cleaned from solids. Secondly the gas before its combustion goes through an acid and basic species removal train of units. In the case of hydrogen generation, besides syngas cleaning from other species, the main pursued objective is to separate CO from H2. In order to accomplish the former, CO should be converted into CO2 and then separated from the main stream. Hydrogen can be further purified to be sold to the market, or used in a combined cycle, in an analogous way as the syngas. Modelling calibration and validation are shown, and the chapter finishes with a model utilisation to evaluate the behaviour of the already built up superstructure to produce hydrogen or syngas for electricity generation section, or hydrogen for other applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ASU:

Air separation unit

CC:

Combined cycle

CCS:

Carbon capture and storage

CGE:

Cold gas efficiency

COE:

Cost of energy

DMPEG:

Dimethyl ethers of polyethylene glycol

ELECNRTL:

Non-random two liquid with electrolytes formation

EOS:

Equation of state

FT:

Fischer–Tropsch process

GHG:

Greenhouse gases

GT:

Gas turbine

GTL:

Gas to liquid fuels

HP:

High pressure

HRSG:

Heat recovery steam generator

IGCC:

Integrated gasification combined cycle

IP:

Intermediate pressure

LHV:

Lower heating value

MCFC:

Molten carbonate fuel cells

MDEA:

Methyl diethyl ethanol amine

NRTL:

Non-random two liquid

PEM:

Proton exchange membranes

PSA:

Pressure swing adsorption

SOFC:

Solid oxide fuel cell

ST:

Steam turbine

TIT:

Turbine inlet temperature

VLE:

Vapor–liquid equilibrium

WGS:

Water gas shift

WHB:

Waste heat boiler

References

  1. Demirbas MF (2009) Biorefineries for biofuel upgrading: a critical review. Appl Energ 86:S151–S161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang L, Weller CL, Jones DD, Hanna MA (2008) Contemporary issues in thermal gasification of biomass and its application to electricity and fuel production. Biomass Bioenerg 32:573–581

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Highman C, van der Burght M (2003) Gasification. Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  4. BTG Biomass Gasification (2008). Technical report, Biomass Technology Group (BTG), The Netherlands. http://www.btgworld.com/uploads/documents/Gasification%20Attachment%20Website%20v2.pdf. Accessed 31 Aug 2010

  5. Bang-Moller C, Rokni M (2010) Thermodynamic performance study of biomass gasification, solid oxide fuel cell and micro gas turbine hybrid systems. Energ Convers Manage 51:2330–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hernández-Pacheco E, Mann MD, Hutton PN, Singh D, Martin KE (2005) A cell-level model for a solid oxide fuel cell operated with syngas from a gasification process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:1221–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wender I (1996) Reactions of synthesis gas. Fuel Process Technol 48:189–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Watson GH (1980) Methanation catalysts, report number ICTIS/TR09, Feb 1980. IEA Coal Research, London

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gassner M, Maréchal F (2009) Thermo-economic process model for thermochemical production of synthetic natural gas (SNG) from lignocellulosic biomass. Biomass Bioenerg 33:1587–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Separation processes, Ullmann’s encyclopedia of industrial chemistry, processes and process engineering (2004). Volume 1, Wiley-VCH Ed

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma SD, Dolan M, Park D, Morpeth L, Ilyushechkin A, McLennan K, Harris DJ, Thambimuthu KV (2008) A critical review of syngas cleaning technologies: fundamental limitations and practical problems. Powder Technol 180:115–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pisa J, Serra de Renobales L, Moreno A, Valero A (1997) Evaluación de alternativas en un diseño de planta GICC con gasificador PRENFLO. XII Congreso Nacional de Ingeniería Mecánica.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brown D, Gassner M, Fuchino T, Maréchal F (2009) Thermo-economic analysis for the optimal conceptual design of biomass gasification energy conversion systems. Appl Therm Eng 29:2137–2152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arena U, Zaccariello L, Matellone ML (2010) Fluidized bed gasification of waste-derived fuels. Waste Manage 30:1212–1219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IEA-GHG (2008) Co-production of hydrogen and electricity by coal gasification with CO2 capture updated economic analysis. Technical report, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Metz B, Davidson O, Coninck H, Loos M, Meyer L (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage, Chapter 3. IPCC, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  17. Huang Y, Rezvani S, McIlveen-Wright D, Minchener A, Hewitt N (2008) Techno-economic study of CO2 capture and storage in coal fired oxygen fed entrained flow IGCC power plants. Fuel Process Technol 89:916–925

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Desideri U, Paolucci A (1999) Performance modelling of a carbon dioxide removal system for power plants. Energy Convers Manage 40:1899–1915

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamelinck CN, Faaij APC (2002) Future propects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. J Power Sources 111:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanniche M, Bouallou C (2007) CO2 capture study in advanced integrated gasification combined cycle. Appl Therm Eng 27:2693–2702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Descamps C, Bouallou C, Kanniche M (2008) Efficiency of an integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant including CO2 removal. Energy 33:874–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen C, Rubin E (2009) CO2 control technology effects on IGCC plant performance and cost. Energy Policy 37:915–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Biagini E, Masoni L, Tognotti L (2010) Comparative study of thermochemical processes for hydrogen production from biomass fuels. Bioresour Technol 101:6381–6388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cormos CC, Cormos A-M, Agachi S (2009) Power generation from coal and biomass based on integrated gasification combined cycle concept with pre- and post- combustion carbon capture methods. Asia-Pac J Chem Eng 4:870–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kanniche M, Gros-Bonnivard R, Jaud P, Valle-Marcos J, Amann J-M, Bouallou C (2010) Pre-combustion, post-combustion and oxy-combustion in thermal power plant for CO2 capture. Appl Therm Eng 30:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prausnitz JM, Lichtenthaler RN, Gomez de Acevedo E (1986) Molecular thermodynamics of fluid-phase equilibria, 2nd edn. PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 269–278

    Google Scholar 

  27. AspenTech Incorporation (2010) Aspen Plus user’s guide. http://support.aspentech.com Accessed 20 Sept 2010

  28. Pérez-Fortes M, Bojarski AD, Velo E, Puigjaner L (2010) IGCC power plants: conceptual design and techno-economic optimization. In: Clean energy: resources, production and developments. Energy science, engineering and technology. NOVA, NY

    Google Scholar 

  29. Chiesa P, Consonni S, Kreutz T, Williams R (2005) Co-production of hydrogen, electricity and CO2 from coal with commercially ready technology. Part A: performance and emissions. Int J Hydrogen Energy 30:747–767

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wells GL, Rose LM (1986) The art of chemical process design. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mastellone ML, Zaccariello L, Arena U (2010) Co-gasification of coal, plastic waste and wood in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Fuel 89:2991–3000

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mar Pérez-Fortes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pérez-Fortes, M., Bojarski, A.D. (2011). Main Purification Operations. In: Puigjaner, L. (eds) Syngas from Waste. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-540-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-540-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-539-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-540-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics