Advertisement

Clinical Study Data Management Systems

  • Prakash M. Nadkarni
Chapter
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)

Abstract

Clinical Study Data Management Systems (CSDMSs) support the process of managing data gathered during clinical research. Clinical research involves much more than clinical data management – for example, research-grant tracking and reporting to the sponsor and to institutional review boards (IRBs, also called Human Investigations Committees) as well as financial management. I’ll focus on the data-capture, reporting and query aspects, as these are the components that benefit from metadata.

Keywords

Case Report Form Data Capture Protocol Authoring Computerize Adaptive Testing Source Document 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1.  1.
    Abadie R. The Professional Guinea Pig: Big Pharma and the Risky World of Human Subjects. Durham: Duke University Press; 2010.Google Scholar
  2.  2.
    Raloff L. The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1(3):385-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3.  3.
    Wikipedia. Computerized adaptive testing. 2010 [cited 4/10/10]; Available from: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computerized_adaptive_testing.
  4.  4.
    Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(11):1179-1194.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5.  5.
    Thwin SS, Clough-Gorr KM, McCarty MC, et al. Automated inter-rater reliability assessment and electronic data collection in a multi-center breast cancer study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007;7:23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6.  6.
    Van den Broeck J, Mackay M, Mpontshane N, Kany Kany LA, Chhagan M, Bennish M. Maintaining data integrity in a rural clinical trial. Clin Trials. 2007;4(5):572-582.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7.  7.
    Wisniewski SR, Leon AC, Otto MW, Trivedi MH. Prevention of missing data in clinical research studies. Biol Psychiatry. 2006;59(11):997-1000.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8.  8.
    Day S, Fayers P, Harvey DR. Double data entry: what value, what price? Control Clin Trials. 1998;19(1):15-24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9.  9.
    Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospital Organizations. National Patient Safety Goals. 2008 [cited 11/03/10]; Available from: http://www.jointcommission.org/PatientSafety/NationalPatientSafetyGoals/08_hap_npsgs.htm.
  10. 10.
    Frank E, Cassano GB, Rucci P, et al. Addressing the challenges of a cross-national investigation: lessons from the Pittsburgh-Pisa study of treatment-relevant phenotypes of unipolar depression. Clin Trials. 2008;5(3):253-261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dupont W, Plummer W. Power and sample size calculations for studies involving linear regression. Control Clin Trials. 1998;19:589-601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Richesson RL, Malloy JF, Paulus K, Cuthbertson D, Krischer JP. An automated standardized system for managing adverse events in clinical research networks. Drug Saf. 2008;31(10):807-822.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang X, Hripcsak G, Markatou M, Friedman C. Active computerized pharmacovigilance using natural language processing, statistics, and electronic health records: a feasibility study. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2009;16(3):328-337.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Prakash M. Nadkarni
    • 1
  1. 1.School of MedicineYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations