There are many diagnostic clinical tests (e.g., apprehension patellar test or the moving patellar apprehension test), outcome measures (general health and knee scales [IKDC form, Kujala scale, Fulkerson scale, Lysholm knee scoring scale, Tegner activity level scale, short form-36]), and instrumented measurements of patellar mobility (static stability), to assess lateral patellar instability.7,10,15,16 However, according to Smith and colleagues,15 the sensitivity/specificity – reliability/validity of such tests and outcome tools remain unclear for this patient population. These authors conclude that further work is needed to assess the appropriateness of these tests and outcomes.15Moreover, there are many surgical techniques to treat patients with chronic lateral patellar instability, all of them based on level of evidence IV or V.4 This is due, in part, to the lackof prospective randomized trials, and also to the lack of an objective, suitable, reliable, valid, and reproducible noninvasive in vivo method to evaluatelateral patellar instability in the clinical setting. This makes it difficult to compare different surgical treatments in order to find the best surgical technique to treat patients with chronic lateral patellar instability.
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
Amis AA. Current concept son anatomy and biomechanics of patellar stability. Sports Med Arthrosc. 2007;15:48-56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amis AA, Firer P, Mountney J, et al. Anatomy and biomechanics of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee. 2003;10:215-220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnbjornsson A, Egund N, Rydling O, et al. The natural history of recurrent dislocation of the patella: long-term results of conservative and operative treatment. J Bone Joint Surg. 1992;74-B:140-142.Google Scholar
Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S, Iacono F, et al. Results in the treatment of recurrent dislocation of the patella after 30 years follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3:163-166.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paxton EW, Fithian DC, Stone ML, et al. The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocations outcomes. Am J Sports Med. 2003;31:487-492.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Post WR, Teitge R, Amis A. Patellofemoral malalignment: looking beyond the viewbox. Clin Sports Med. 2002;21:521-546.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prat-Pastor JM. Biomecánica de la marcha humana normal y patológica. Valencia: IBV; 2005.Google Scholar
Sanchis-Alfonso V, Baydal-Bertomeu JM, Castelli A, et al. Laboratory evaluation of the pivot shift phenomenon with use of kinetic analysis. A preliminary study. J. Bone Joint Surg (Am) (In press).Google Scholar
Sillanpaa P, Mattila VM, Visuri T, et al. Ligament reconstruction versus distal realignment for patellar dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1475-1484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith TO, Davies L, O’Driscoll ML, et al. An evaluation of the clinical tests and outcome measures used to assess patellar instability. Knee. 2008;15:255-256.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strobel M, Stedtfeld H-W. Diagnostic evaluation of the knee. Berlin: Springer; 1990.Google Scholar