Changing Practices of Family Television Watching

  • Barry Brown
  • Louise Barkhuus
Chapter

Abstract

There are few technologies as maligned, or as misunderstood, as the television. Television has achieved a massive prevalence in nearly every country across the world, with most households (even in developing countries) having more than one television set or display. There appears to be something uniquely compelling about watching telly, and also in a device that works as soon as it is turned on, and takes no training to use. Television is a distinctly ubiquitous technology and television broadcasts (such as major sporting events) act as some of the biggest simultaneous world events. Yet as a technology it is also much misunderstood – it is frequently characterized as unchanging and obsolete, anti-social and isolating (e.g. Putnam 2001). As this chapter documents, television is none of these things – throughout its history it has been in constant evolution, both technically and in terms of content. Moreover television watching is an activity that is intimately connected with the social life of households.

References

  1. Brown, B., E. Geelhoed and A. Sellen. 2001. Music sharing as a computer supported collaborative application. In Proceedings of ECSCW 2001, Prinz, W. et al (Eds) 179–198. Bonn, Germany: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  2. Chandler, A. 2001. Inventing the electronic century: The epic story of the consumer electronics and computer science industries: Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Dickinson, R., R. Harindranath and O. Linné eds. 1998. Approaches to audiences – a reader. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  4. Gauntlett, D. 1998. Ten things wrong with the “Effects model”. In Approaches to audiences – a reader, Dickinson, R, Harindranath, R and Linné, O, (Eds) Op cit. 120-30. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
  5. Gauntlett, D. and A. Hill. 1999. Tv living: Technology, culture and everyday life: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Hamill, L. 2003. ‘Time as a rare commodity in home life’, Inside the smart home, ed Harper, R. Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Kubery, R. and M. Csikszentmihalyi. 1990. Television and the quality of life: How viewing shapes everyday experience, Lawrence Erlbaum: Hilsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  8. Milavsky, J.R., R.C. Kessler, H.H. Stipp and W.S. Rubens. 1982. Television and aggression: A panel study, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  9. Miller, D. 1998. A theory of shopping, Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  10. Morley, D. and C. Brunsdon. 1999. The Nationwide Television Studies: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Putnam, R. 2001. Bowling alone : The collapse and revival of American community: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  12. Rode, J., E. Toye and A. Blackwell. 2005. ‘The domestic economy: A broader unit of analysis for end user programming,’ In Proceedings of CHI'05, 1757-60: ACM.Google Scholar
  13. Rubin, A. 1983. ‘Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations,’ Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 27, no. 1: 37-51.Google Scholar
  14. Silverstone, R. 1994. Television and everyday life: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Taylor, A. and Harper, R. 2003. ‘Switching on to switch off,’ In Inside the smart home, ed. Harper, R. Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Turner, G. 2001. ‘Television and cultural studies: Unfinished business’, International Journal of Cultural Studies 4, no. 4: 371-84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Barry Brown
    • 1
  • Louise Barkhuus
    • 2
  1. 1.Mobile Life VINN Excellence CenterStockholmSweden
  2. 2.University of CaliforniaSan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations