From Smart Home to Connected Home

  • Richard Harper
Chapter

Abstract

Until quite recently, the development of smart homes as a new form of housing, combining both novel computer applications within and network access without, seemed appealing and imminent. The expectation was that new smart home technologies would alter how families entertain themselves with mum’s and dad’s sharing ‘lean forward’ interaction experiences on the internet enabled TV, for example (See Taylor & Harper, 2003: pp115-126); it was thought too that kids would be provided with revolutionary educational tools that would alter the relationship they had with homework (and with the institution of school) (Randall, 2004: pp227-246). Perhaps most commonplace – and thus hardly worth citing any instances of this view - was the assertion that those individuals who chose to work at home would find all the networked access they required delivered to their door: only old fashioned habit and the occasional face to face meeting would force them to leave and actually go to work. Work would come home; travel would reduce.

References

  1. Brush, A.J., Lee, B., Mahajan, R., Agarwal, A., Saroiu, S. & Dixon, C. (2011) ‘Home Automation in the Wild: Challenges and Opportunities’, Proc. of CHI 2011, ACM Press, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  2. Cohn, G. Morris, D. Patel, S. & Tan. D (2011) ‘Your Noise is My Command: Sensing Gestures Using the Body as an Antenna’, Proc. CHI 2011, ACM Press Vancouver.Google Scholar
  3. Douglas, M. (2002): Purity and Danger, (originally published 1966), Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  4. Grimes, A. & Harper, R. (2008) ‘Celebratory Technology: new directions in food research for HCI’, in Proceedings of CHI’08, ACM Press, Florence.Google Scholar
  5. Hamill, L. & Harper, R. (2006) ‘Talking Intelligence: a historical and conceptual exploration of speech-based human-machine interaction in smart homes’, Proceedings Intelligent Environments Symposium, Homerton College, Cambridge, April.Google Scholar
  6. Harper, R. (2010) Texture: human expression in the age of communications overload, MIT Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  7. Harper, R. (2005), ‘The Moral Order of Text: Explorations in the social performance of SMS’ in Mobile Communication – Perspectives and Current Research Fields, Hoflich, J. & Gebhart, J. (eds), Peter Lang GmbH – Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin, pp199-222.Google Scholar
  8. Intille, S. ‘Designing a home of the future’, IEEE Pervasive Computing 1, 2(2002), 80-86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kietz, J., Patel, S., Jones, B., Price, E., Mynatt, E., Abowd, A. ‘The Georgia Tech Aware Home’, Ext. Abstracts CHI 2008, 3675-3680.Google Scholar
  10. Martin, B. (1984): ‘Mother Wouldn’t Like It!’ Housework as Magic’. Theory, Culture & Society, Vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 19-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Massey, D (1993) ‘Power-geometry and a Progressive Sense of Place’, in Bird, et al, (eds) Mapping the Futures: Local Cultures, Global Change, Routledge: London.Google Scholar
  12. Mozer, M.C. (2005) Lessons from an Adaptive House. In D. Cook and R. Das (eds.) Smart Environments: Technologies, Protocols, and Applications (pp. 273-294). J. Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ.Google Scholar
  13. Randall. D. (2003) ‘Living Inside a Smart Home: a case study’ in Harper, R. (Ed.) (2003) Inside the Smart Home, Springer, London, pp227-245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Taylor, A. & Harper., R. (2003) Switching on to Switch Off, in Harper, R. (Ed.) (2003) Inside the Smart Home, Springer, London, pp115-124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Taylor, A. Harper, R. Swann, L. Izadi, S. Sellen, A. Perry, M. (2007) ‘Homes that make us Smart’, The Journal of Personal Technologies, Springer, London, 11(5), 383-393.Google Scholar
  16. Strain J. (2003) ‘Households as Morally Ordered Communities’, in Harper (Ed) Inside the Smart Home, Springer, London, pp41-61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer London 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard Harper
    • 1
  1. 1.Microsoft Research Ltd.CambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations