Measurement of Individual Activity (Explicit Text)

  • Bruce R. Schatz
  • Richard B. BerlinJr.
Part of the Health Informatics book series (HI)


The data that could be measured is far greater than what is currently measured. Partially this is due to a lack of breadth in what health features are considered medically significant. Partially this is due to a lack of depth in what information technologies are considered practically deployable. This Part II systematically examines the range of features that could potentially be relevant to measuring health and then systematically examines the range of technologies that could potentially be utilized to measure these features. This is the health informatics foundation of viable health systems.


Sentiment Analysis Health Assessment Questionnaire McGill Pain Questionnaire Health Diary Abnormal Case 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 16.
    Bergner M, Bobbitt R, Carter W, et al. The sickness impact profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787-805.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 17.
    Berkman L, Glass T, Brissette I, et al. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:843-857.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 18.
    Berkman L, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 20.
    Berlin R, Schatz B. Monitoring quality of life for congestive heart failure populations. Congest Heart Fail. 2001;7(1):13-23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 23.
    Blessed G, Tomlinson B, Roth M. Blessed-Roth dementia scale (DS). Psychopharmacol Bull. 1988;24:705-708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 27.
    Bosworth H, Siegler I, Brummet B, et al. The association between self-rated health and mortality in a well-characterized sample of coronary artery disease patients. Med Care. 1999;37:1226-1236.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 46.
    Chee B, Berlin R, Schatz B. Measuring Population Health using Personal Health Messages, American Medical Informatics Association (AMIA) Annual Symposium; November, 2009; San Francisco: 5 pp.Google Scholar
  8. 105.
    Hemingway H, Stafford M, Stansfield S, et al. Is the SF-36 a valid measure of change in population health? Results from the Whitehall II study. Br Med J. 1997;315:1273-1278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 115.
    Hunt S, McKenna S, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham health profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med. 1981;15:221-229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 125.
    Jorm A, Jacomb P. The informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity, and norms. Psychol Med. 1989;19:1015-1022.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 152.
    Marmot M, Davey M, Stanfield S, et al. Health inequalities among British civil servants: the Whitehall II study. Lancet. 1991;337:1387-1393.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 154.
    Marmot M. Multilevel approaches to understanding social determinants. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000; chap 15, [Ref 18].Google Scholar
  13. 156.
    Marmot M, Wilkinson R, eds. The Social Determinants of Health. 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  14. 160.
    McDowell I. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.Google Scholar
  15. 162.
    McHorney C. Generic health measurement: past accomplishments and a measurement paradigm for the 21st century. Ann Intern Med. 1997;127:743-750.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 176.
    Pang B, Lee L. Opinion mining and sentiment analysis. Found Trends Info Retrieval. 2008;2(1–2):1-135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 180.
    Pennebaker J, Francis M, Booth R. Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count: LIWC 2007. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2007.Google Scholar
  18. 195.
    Radloff L. The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Appl Psychol Meas. 1977;1:385-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 219.
    Sanders B, Berlin R, Schatz B. Adaptive Question Answering for Population Health Measurement, American Medical Informatics Association AMIA submitted.; 2008.
  20. 239.
    Stewart A, Ware J, eds. Measuring Functioning and Well-Being: The Medical Outcomes Study Approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.Google Scholar
  21. 243.
    Tannenbaum A. Computer Networks. 4th ed. New York: Prentice-Hall; 2002; chapter 4.Google Scholar
  22. 244.
    Tarlov A, Ware J, Greenfield S, et al. The medical outcomes study: an application of methods for monitoring the results of medical care. J Am Med Assoc. 1989;262:925-930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 247.
    Tengs T, Wallace A. One thousand health-related quality of life estimates. Med Care. 2000;38:583-637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 249.
    Theorell T. Working conditions and health. In: Berkman L, Kawachi I, eds. Social Epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000, Chap. 5 in [Ref 18].Google Scholar
  25. 262.
    Veith I. The Yellow Emperor’s Classic of Internal Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 265.
    Ware J, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-481.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 294.
    Zung WT. A self-rating depression scale. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1965;12:63-70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 296.
    Zung WT. A self-rating pain and distress scale. Psychosomatics. 1983;24:887-894.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bruce R. Schatz
    • 1
  • Richard B. BerlinJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Medical Information Science, Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA

Personalised recommendations