Skip to main content

Managing safety barriers and controls at the workplace

  • Conference paper
Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management

Abstract

There have been major developments in the analysis, modelling and management of major hazards in the last two decades. European projects such as PRIMA [1], I-Risk [2] and ARAMIS [3] have developed integrated models linking the technical and procedural factors in loss of containment incidents to the management systems needed to implement and guarantee risk control. Whilst there are many issues still to be resolved in making these links quantitatively and in assessing the quality of the management systems and culture, this work has provided systematic and transparent models of the scenarios which have to be controlled. In contrast, workplace safety has far fewer systematic models and approaches. It operates far more on accumulated good practice and generic approaches, which lack precision, consistent coverage and the ability to form the basis for decisions on priority for improvement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hurst N.W., Young S., Donald I., Gibson H & Muyselaar A. 1996. Measures of safety management performance and attitudes to safety at major hazard sites. J. of Loss Prevention in the Process Industry. 9(2). 161–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Papazoglou I. A., Bellamy L.J., Hale A.R., Aneziris O.N., B.J.M. Ale, Post J.G., Oh J.I.H 2003. I-RISK: “Development of an Integrated technical and management risk methodology for Chemical Installations” J. of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Vol 16 575–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Salvi O., Kirchsteiger C., Delvosalle C., Duijm N.J., Casal J., Goossens L., Mazzarotta B., Lebecki K., Wybo J-L., Duserre G., Londiche H. & Calzia J. 2001. ARAMIS. Accidental risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of Seveso II directive. Paper to the Seminar on Progress in European Research on Major Hazards. Brussels 10 October. Chemical Risks Directorate. Belgian Ministry of Labour. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  4. Visser J.P. 1998. Developments in HSE management in oil and gas exploration and production, in Hale A.R. & Baram M. (Eds.) Safety management: the challenge of organisational change. Pergamon. Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haddon Jr. W. 1973. Energy Damage and the Ten Counter-Measure Strategies. Human Factors Journal, August.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Debray B., Delvosalle C., Fiévez C., Pipart A., Londiche H.,. Hubert E 2004. Defining safety functions and safety barriers from fault and event trees analysis of major industrial hazards. This conference.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Duijm N-J, Hourtolou D, Hale A.R., Goossens L.H.J. 2004. Managing safety functions and barriers in major hazard plant. This conference.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hollnagel, E. 1999. Accidents and barriers. In Hoc J.-M., Millot P., Hollnagel E. & Cacciabue P. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of Lez Valenciennes, 28, 175-182. Presses Universitaires de Valenciennes.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Johnson W.G. 1980. MORT Safety Assurance Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Statisitics on Accidents at Work (ESAW). 2001. Methodology Eurostat.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Swuste, P., 1996. Occupational hazards, risks and solutions. Doctoral Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Svenson O. 1991. The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries. Risk Analysis 11(3) 499–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hale A.R., Goossens L.H.J., Costa M.F., Matos L., Wielaard P. & Smit K. 2000. Expert judgement for the assessment of management influences on risk control. In: Cottam M.P., Harvey D.W., Pape R.P. & Tait J. (eds). Foresight & Precaution. 1077–1082. Balkema. Rotterdam

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hale, A. et al. (2004). Managing safety barriers and controls at the workplace. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U., Dang, V.N. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_99

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_99

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1057-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-410-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics