Managing safety barriers and controls at the workplace

  • Andrew Hale
  • Louis Goossens
  • Ben Ale
  • Linda Bellamy
  • Jos Post
  • Joy Oh
  • Ioannis A. Papazoglou


There have been major developments in the analysis, modelling and management of major hazards in the last two decades. European projects such as PRIMA [1], I-Risk [2] and ARAMIS [3] have developed integrated models linking the technical and procedural factors in loss of containment incidents to the management systems needed to implement and guarantee risk control. Whilst there are many issues still to be resolved in making these links quantitatively and in assessing the quality of the management systems and culture, this work has provided systematic and transparent models of the scenarios which have to be controlled. In contrast, workplace safety has far fewer systematic models and approaches. It operates far more on accumulated good practice and generic approaches, which lack precision, consistent coverage and the ability to form the basis for decisions on priority for improvement.


Smoke Alarm Safety Management System Major Hazard Management Influence Event Tree Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hurst N.W., Young S., Donald I., Gibson H & Muyselaar A. 1996. Measures of safety management performance and attitudes to safety at major hazard sites. J. of Loss Prevention in the Process Industry. 9(2). 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Papazoglou I. A., Bellamy L.J., Hale A.R., Aneziris O.N., B.J.M. Ale, Post J.G., Oh J.I.H 2003. I-RISK: “Development of an Integrated technical and management risk methodology for Chemical Installations” J. of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries Vol 16 575–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salvi O., Kirchsteiger C., Delvosalle C., Duijm N.J., Casal J., Goossens L., Mazzarotta B., Lebecki K., Wybo J-L., Duserre G., Londiche H. & Calzia J. 2001. ARAMIS. Accidental risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of Seveso II directive. Paper to the Seminar on Progress in European Research on Major Hazards. Brussels 10 October. Chemical Risks Directorate. Belgian Ministry of Labour. BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Visser J.P. 1998. Developments in HSE management in oil and gas exploration and production, in Hale A.R. & Baram M. (Eds.) Safety management: the challenge of organisational change. Pergamon. Oxford.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Haddon Jr. W. 1973. Energy Damage and the Ten Counter-Measure Strategies. Human Factors Journal, August.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Debray B., Delvosalle C., Fiévez C., Pipart A., Londiche H.,. Hubert E 2004. Defining safety functions and safety barriers from fault and event trees analysis of major industrial hazards. This conference.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Duijm N-J, Hourtolou D, Hale A.R., Goossens L.H.J. 2004. Managing safety functions and barriers in major hazard plant. This conference.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollnagel, E. 1999. Accidents and barriers. In Hoc J.-M., Millot P., Hollnagel E. & Cacciabue P. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of Lez Valenciennes, 28, 175-182. Presses Universitaires de Valenciennes.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Johnson W.G. 1980. MORT Safety Assurance Systems. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    European Statisitics on Accidents at Work (ESAW). 2001. Methodology Eurostat.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Swuste, P., 1996. Occupational hazards, risks and solutions. Doctoral Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Svenson O. 1991. The accident evolution and barrier function (AEB) model applied to incident analysis in the processing industries. Risk Analysis 11(3) 499–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hale A.R., Goossens L.H.J., Costa M.F., Matos L., Wielaard P. & Smit K. 2000. Expert judgement for the assessment of management influences on risk control. In: Cottam M.P., Harvey D.W., Pape R.P. & Tait J. (eds). Foresight & Precaution. 1077–1082. Balkema. RotterdamGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Hale
    • 1
  • Louis Goossens
    • 1
  • Ben Ale
    • 1
  • Linda Bellamy
    • 2
  • Jos Post
    • 3
  • Joy Oh
    • 4
  • Ioannis A. Papazoglou
    • 5
  1. 1.Safety Science GroupDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  2. 2.White Queen B.V.HoofddorpNetherlands
  3. 3.National Institute for Public Health and the EnvironmentBilthovenNetherlands
  4. 4.Ministry of Social Affairs & EmploymentDen HaagNetherlands
  5. 5.National Centre for Scientific Research “Demokritos”AthensGreece

Personalised recommendations