Development of Management of Nuclear Power Plant Fire Situations

  • Kristiina Hukki
  • Jan-Erik Holmberg
Conference paper


Fire risk analyses have shown that fires can be a major contributor to nuclear power plant risks (OECD 2000). They are also known to be very demanding for the control room operators due to the complexity and uncertainty related to these situations. The propagation of the fire and the effects of the fire on the plant process and the systems and the devices may be very hard to foresee and the circumstances may deteriorate the operators’ physical and mental capacity. The problems of management are reflected in the difficulties experienced in the development of procedures and training for fire situations.


Nuclear Power Plant Control Room Fire Risk Simulator Training Fire Management 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    OECD: Fire risk analysis, fire simulation, fire spreading and impact of smoke and heat on instrumentation electronics. NEA/CSNI/R(99)27, State-of-the-Art-Report 2000Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gil, B, Yllera J. A Reference Framework for the Development and Documentation of Human Reliability Analyses for Fire PSAs. Proceedings of thr International Workshop on Fire Risk Assessment, 29 June to 1 July, Helsinki, 1999Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kazarians, M. Fire PSA — Applications and Insiights. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Fire Risk Assessment, 29 June to 1 July, Helsinki, 1999Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hukki K, Norros L. Subject-centred and systemic conceptualisation as a tool of simulator training. Le Travail Humain 1998; 4: 313–331Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Norros L, Nuutinen M. The Core-task Concept as a Tool to Analyse Working Practices. In: Boreham N, Samurcay R, Fischer M (eds.), Work Process Knowledge, Routledge 2002Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vicente K. Cognitive Work Analysis. Toward Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work. Lawrence Erlbaum, London, 1999Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holmberg J, Hukki K, Norros L, Pulkkinen U, Pyy P. An integrated approach to human reliability analysis — decision analytic dynamic reliability model. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 1999; 65: 239–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hukki K, Holmberg J. A conceptual tool for supporting risk-informed decision-making in NPP fire situations (in preparation)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kristiina Hukki
    • 1
  • Jan-Erik Holmberg
    • 1
  1. 1.VTT Industrial SystemsEspooFinland

Personalised recommendations