Advertisement

Lessons Learnt from Review of PSA Studies for VVER-type Reactors

  • Gennady Tokmachev
  • Artur Lyubarskiy
Conference paper

Abstract

The last decade many Level 1 PSA studies were performed in Russia, Ukraine, and Armenia for WER-type reactors. As a rule, theses studies were carried out within multinational bilingual projects. The authors were involved in some of them from either PSA team or review team side. The paper presents main findings of the review which could be useful for PSA practitioners and reviewers of other multi-faceted projects. The paper analyses importance of the key issues in terms of quality and consistency of PSA. The experience gained from the reviews was used for developing PSA norm documents issued by the Russian Regulatory Body.

Keywords

Nuclear Power Plant Regulatory Review Plant Safety Review Experience Probabilistic Safety Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    V. Rozin, W. Puglia, C. Afshar, and P. Pizzica. Organization and Management of the Plant Safety Evaluation of the VVER-440/230 Units at Novovoronezh. In: M. Modarres (Ed.) Proceedings of the PSA′99 International Topical Meeting on Probabilistic Safety Assessment“Risk-Informed, and Performance-Based Regulation in the New Millennium”, Volume 1, p.29-37, August 22-26, 1999, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    O. Sevbo, I. Lola. South Ukraine NPP Unit 1 PSA Results, Insights and Recommendations, International Workshop safety of WER-1000 nuclear power plants, 7-12 April 2003, Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    O. Kocharyants, V. Boychuk, T. Voytovich. Results of ZNPP Unit 5 PSA and Their Application for Modernization Evaluation, International Workshop safety of WER-1000 nuclear power plants, 7-12 April 2003, Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    A. Lioubarski, I. Kouzmina, T. Berg, et al. Novovoronezh Unit 5 Probabilistic Safety Assessment. Part I: PSA Level-1 for Internal Initiating Events. Main Report. Project SWISRUS. SWISRUS-99-001. Scientific and Engineering Center for Nuclear and Radiation Safety of the Federal Nuclear Safety Authority of Russia. — Moscow, 1999 — 445 p.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    J A Carretero, Y Shvyryaev, G Tokmachev, et al. Results of Novovoronezh-3 PSA performed within TACIS-91 Programme In: Proceedings of the TOPSAFE′98 International Conference held by the European Nuclear Society and the Spanish Nuclear Society in Valencia, Spain, April 15-17, 1998. Senda Editorial, S.A: CD-Rom“TOPSAFE′98 Papers”.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu. Shviriaev, G. Tokmachev, E. Baikova. Results of updated PSA for advanced VVER-1000, Seventh International Information Exchange Forum on“Safety Analysis for Nuclear Power Plants of WER and RBMK Types” (Forum-7, 28-30 October, 2003, Piešt’any, Slovakia)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu.Shvyriaev, A.Barsukov, O.Krasnoriadtseva, and G.Tokmachev. PSA application for operating NPPs and NPPs under design with WER-1000 reactors (Balakovo NPP), International Workshop safety of WER-1000 nuclear power plants, 7-12 April 2003, Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    G.Ershov and A.Sobolev. Plant status and PSA of Tianwan NPP, International Workshop safety of WER-1000 nuclear power plants, 7-12 April 2003, Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    A. Lubarski. Overview of WER-1000 PSAs, International Workshop safety of WER-1000 nuclear power plants, 7-12 April 2003, Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    A. Lubarski, G.Samokhin, D.Noskov. Review of Insights gained from PSA in Russia, International Workshop on Safety of WER-1000 Nuclear Power Plants, 7-12 April 2003, Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Klevtsov. Insights gained from PSA Level 1 Reviews in Ukraine, International Workshop on Safety of WER-1000 Nuclear Power Plants, 7-12 April 2003, Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Atomic Energy Agency. IPERS guidelines for the international peer review service. Second Edition, IAEA-TECDOC-832, IAEA, 1995, Vienna.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Atomic Energy Agency. Regulatory review of probabilistic safety assessment (PSA) Level 1, IAEA-TECDOC-1135, IAEA, 2000, Vienna.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    I. Kouzmina. Insights from IAEA Workshop on Harmonization of PSAs for WER-440 Plants, International Workshop on Safety of First-Generation WER-440 Nuclear Power Plants, 20-24 May 2002; Piešt’any, SlovakiaGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gosatomnadzor of Russia. Guide for performing review of probabilistic safety assessment of nuclear power plants, 2002, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gosatomnadzor of Russia, General Provisions of Nuclear Power Plants Safety, OPB — 88/97, 1997, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gosatomnadzor of Russia. Policy Statement“Application of Probabilistic Safety Assessment for Operating Units of Nuclear Power Plants”, 1999, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gosatomnadzor of Russia, Recommendations on carrying out level 1 probabilistic safety assessment for internal initiating events, 2003, MoscowGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gennady Tokmachev
    • 1
  • Artur Lyubarskiy
    • 2
  1. 1.AtomenergoproektMoscowRussia
  2. 2.SEC NRS Gosatomnadzor RFMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations