Advertisement

Analysis of Accidental Scenarios and Flammable Liquid Classes, according to the Review of Metodo Speditivo

  • Mario Tucci
  • Lorenzo Giagnoni
  • Irene Cappelli
  • Lorenzo Gavilli
  • Marcello Mossa Verre
Conference paper

Abstract

In Italy the high-risk issue is specifically managed by the Italian law D. Lgs 334/99, which takes into account the provisions of the CEE Directive 82/96, named Seveso II Directive. The D.Lgs 334/99 defines the productive processes, the properties and quantities of the dangerous substances and the operative procedures that identify the major-risk plants. In case of large stored quantities the manager must draft a safety report with risk and consequences analysis and the safety measures taken in order to obtain an acceptable safety level. The safety report is delivered to APAT (National Environmental Protection Agency) and ARPA (Regional Environmental Protection Agency), who are entrusted with the inspection and control of the high-risk plants.

Keywords

Flame Speed Pool Fire Safety Report Regional Environmental Protection Agency Lower Flammability Limit 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Guide to Hazardous Industrial Activities. Ministry of the Interior, Crisis Management and Fire Directorate, The Netherlands, 1988.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    AA. VV., Linee guida del dipartimento della Protezione Civile della Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri per la Pianificazione di Emergenza Esterna per impianti industriali a rischio di incidente rilevante, 1994.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Manual for the classification and prioritization of risks due to major accidents in process and related industries. IAEA-TECDOC-727, Wien 1993.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Requisiti minimi in materia di pianificazione territoriale per le zone interessate da stabilimenti a rischio di incidente rilevante. D.M. 9\05\2001.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Revisione del Metodo Speditivo per la valutazione delle conseguenze incidentali, I Stato di avanzamento. Rapporto elaborato da ARPAT su incarico di ANPA nell’ambito della convenzione n° 122 del 22.03.2001, 2002.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    DNV Phast 6.1 Compiled Help.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    How do I add a material from DIPPR database?, DNV Risk Management Software Support article, 2002.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    H.W.M. Wiltlox, Unified Dispersion Model (UDM). Theory Manual. 2001.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lorenzo Gavilli, Revisione del Metodo Speditivo per la valutazione delle conseguenze incidentali. Calcolo delle distanze di danno per liquidi infiammabili stoccati in serbatoi fissi. Degree Dissertation, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Tucci
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Giagnoni
    • 1
  • Irene Cappelli
    • 1
  • Lorenzo Gavilli
    • 1
  • Marcello Mossa Verre
    • 2
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Energetica “Sergio Stecco”, Sezione Impianti e Tecnologie industrialiUniversità degli Studi di FirenzeFirenze
  2. 2.Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione Ambientale della Toscana (ARPAT)Firenze

Personalised recommendations