Virtual Reality for Safety Analysis

  • S. Stüring
  • A. Trasi
Conference paper


The role of Virtual Reality for training purposes is nowadays widely accepted as very effective training technology. In this paper we introduce the contribution of Virtual Reality techniques to improve methodologies to identify and control potential failures associated with Human Factors.


Virtual Reality Virtual Environment Human Reliability Probabilistic Safety Assessment Virtual Reality Technique 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Simpson G., Tunley C., Burton M. Development of human factors methods and associated standards for major hazard industries. HSE books, Sudbury, 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Degani A., Wiener E.L. On the design of flight-deck procedures. NASA contractor report 177642, Ames Research Center, Moffet Field, CA, USA, 1994Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 1998Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swain A.D., Guttmann H.E. Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. NUREG/CR-1278. Sandia National Lab, NM, 1983Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirwan B. validation of human reliability assessment technique: part 1, validation issues. Safety Science, 1997;27:25–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heinrich H.W., Roos N.R., Brown J., Hazlett S., Petersen D. Industrial accident prevention: a safety management approach. McGraw-Hill, 1980Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jones S., Kirchsteiger C., Bjerke W. The importance of near miss reporting to further improve safety performance. Journal of Loss Prevention, 1999; 12: 59–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Stassen A.D., Johannsen G., Moray N. Internal representation, internal model, human performance model and mental workload. Automatica, 1990; 26: 811–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cacciabue P.C. Modelling and simulation of human behaviour in system control. Springer, London, UK, 1998CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vince J. Essential Virtual Reality fast Springer Verlag, 1998Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sian B., Robertson M. Line-oriented Human Factors training: MRM III. In FAA/AAM Human Factors in Aviation Maintenance and Inspection Research Phase Reports, 1999, Phase VIII Progress ReportGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Goldstein I. Training in organizations. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1993Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith B.R., Tyler S.W. The design and application of MIDAS: A constructive simulation for human-system analysis. SIMTECT Conf, Camberra, Australia, 1997Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rickel J., Johnson W.L. Animated agents for procedural training in VR: perception, cognition and motor control. Applied Artificial Intelligence 1999, 13:343–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Baranzini D., Trasi A. Virtual Environment Training Systems for Aircraft Maintenance Domain: A Technical and Human Factors Training Integration. Paper presented at the 20th European Annual Conference on Human Decision Making and Manual Control, Kongens Lyngby (Copenhagen), Denmark, 25-27 June 2001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Stüring
    • 1
  • A. Trasi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of VITFraunhofer Institut IFFMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations