Advertisement

Deterministic and Probabilistic Analysis Supporting the Safety Case for a Proposed Deep Geological Repository in Opalinus Clay in Northern Switzerland

  • J. W. Schneider
  • L. Johnson
  • P. Zuidema
  • G. Mayer

Abstract

The Swiss waste management concept foresees two types of deep geological repositories for the disposal of all radioactive wastes arising in Switzerland: a repository for low and intermediate-level waste and a repository for spent fuel (SF), vitrified high-level waste (HLW) and long-lived intermediate-level waste (ILW). In the course of the last 20 years several safety assessments have been conducted for these repository types and significant experience has been gained with safety analyses. Although in the past the main emphasis was on deterministic analyses, more recently capabilities to conduct probabilistic analyses have also been developed. In the most recent Safety Case [1,2] both deterministic and probabilistic analyses have been used in a complementary manner. It is the purpose of this paper to illustrate this complementary use of the two approaches in making the Safety Case.

Keywords

Radioactive Waste Probabilistic Analysis Spend Fuel Deterministic Analysis Deep Geological Repository 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Nagra (2002a): Project Opalinus Clay: Safety Report. Demonstration of disposal feasibility for spent fuel, vitrified high-level waste and long-lived intermediate-level waste (Entsorgungsnachweis). Nagra Technical Report NTB 02-05. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nagra (2002b): Project Opalinus Clay: Models, Codes and Data for Safety Assessment. Demonstration of disposal feasibility for spent fuel, vitrified high-level waste and long-lived intermediate-level waste (Entsorgungsnachweis). Nagra Technical Report NTB 02-06. Nagra, Wettingen, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    NEA (1999c): The role of the analysis of the biosphere and human behaviour in integrated performance assessments. OECD/NEA Nuclear Energy Agency PAAG document NEA/RWM/PAAG(99)5.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sumerling, T.J., Zuidema, P., Schneider, J.W. & van Dorp, F. (2001): Treatment of the biosphere — seeking credible illustrations. In: American Nuclear Society: Proceedings of the 9th International High Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference, 29. April-3. May 2001, Las Vegas, Nevada, Session N-7.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    HSK & KSA (1993): Protection objectives for the disposal of radioactive waste, HSK-R-21/e. Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (HSK) and Federal Commission for the Safety of Nuclear Installations (KSA), Villigen-HSK, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    ICRP (1991): 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 60, Annals of the ICRP 21/1-3. Pergamon Press, Oxford and New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. W. Schneider
    • 1
  • L. Johnson
    • 1
  • P. Zuidema
    • 1
  • G. Mayer
    • 2
  1. 1.NagraWettingenSwitzerland
  2. 2.Colenco Engineering AGBadenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations