Public perceptions of energy efficiency and recycling: how these can inform the communications and design processes

  • Sharon Joyce
  • Joan Harvey
  • Peter Norman


This paper presents two studies into energy efficiency and recycling whose aim is to explain why behaviour of the public continues largely to disregard the available advice and knowledge. Three factors for attitudes to recycling were found; sex and nationality differences were found in both attitudes and behaviour. Attributional analyses suggests that non-sustainability issues may govern people’s responses to recycling. Results are discussed with reference to the implications for designers.


Nationality Difference Attitude Item Sustainable Behaviour Probabilistic Safety Assessment Money Issue 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ajzen, I (1991) The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Decision Processes Vol 50: 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grob A (1995) A structural model of environmental attitudes and behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology Vol 15(3) 209–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harvey, J, Erdos, G, and Challinor S (2001) The relationship between attitudes, demographic factors and perceived consumption of meats and other proteins in relation to the BSE crisis: a regional study in the United Kingdom. Health, Risk and Society: Vol 3 No 2: page 181–197Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thompson PB (1997) Evaluating energy efficiency investments: accounting for risk in the discounting process Energy Policy 25(12): 989–996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Veitch JA and Gifford R (1996) Choice, perceived control, and performance decrements in the physical environment Journal Of Environmental Psychology 16(3): 269–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zimmer MR, Stafford TF and Stafford MR (1994) Green Issues — Dimensions Of Environmental Concern Journal of Business Research 30(1): 63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Colbourne D, Lorenzoni I, Powell J, et al. (1999) Identifying social attitudes to assist urban energy planning in Leicester International Journal Of Sustainable Development World 6(4): 265–280Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Samuelson CD and Biek M (1991) Attitudes Toward Energy-Conservation — A Confirmatory Factor-Analysis Journal Of Applied Social Psychology 21(7): 549–568CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    DeYoung R (1996) Some psychological aspects of reduced consumption behavior: The role of intrinsic satisfaction and competence motivation. Environment and Behavior Vol 28(3): 358–409CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Allen J, Davis D and Soskin M (1993) Using coupon incentives in recycling aluminium-a market approach to energy conservation policy. Journal of Consumer Affairs Vol 27(2) 300–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Malafarina K and Jass J (1994) An examination of the psychometric properties of a conservation-oriented consumption scale. Advances in Consumer Research Vol XXI: chapter 21: 536–542.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kishino H, Hanyu K, Yamashita M, et al., (1999) Recycling and consumption in Germany and Japan: a case of toilet paper Resources conservation and recycling 26(3-4): 189–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Roberts M (1996) Plastics waste-Germany beats recycling targets. Chemical week 158(22): 22–22 Jun 5 1996Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Munton, GA, Silvester, J, Stratton, P et al.,(1999). Attributions in action: a practical approach to coding qualitative data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Verplanken B and M Weenig (1993) Graphical energy labels and consumers’ decisions about home appliances: A process tracing approach. Journal of Economic Psychology Vol 14 pt 4: 739–752CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Banerjee A and B D Solomon (2002) Eco-labelling for energy efficiency and sustainability: a meta-evaluation of US programs. Energy Policy Vol 31 pt 2: 109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stoyell, JL, Norman P, Howarth CR et al., (1999) Results of a Questionnaire Investigation on the Management of Environmental Issues during Conceptual Design: A Case Study of two Large Made-to-Order Companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 457–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kooreman P and Steerneman, T (1998) A note on the energy-efficiency investments of an expected cost minimizer. Resource and Energy Economics Vol 20 pt 4: 373–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Batley, S. Colbourne, D. Fleming, P. and P. Urwin (2000) Citizen versus Consumer: challenges in the UK green power market. Energy Policy Vol 29 pt 6: 479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sharon Joyce
    • 1
  • Joan Harvey
    • 1
  • Peter Norman
    • 1
  1. 1.Engineering Design CentreUniversity of NewcastleNewcastle upon TyneUK

Personalised recommendations