Advertisement

Liability and Controlling Technological Risks. Ethical and Decision Theoretical Foundations

  • Henk Zandvoort
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper contains a formulation of the ethical and decision theoretical requirements that must be imposed upon legal liability in view of responsible and coherent decision making and management regarding the risks of technology. These requirements are compared with actual and historical liability law, and with the law and economics approach to liability. A description is given of how these requirements serve as a framework for a comparative and evaluative research project on the regulation and liability legislation governing energy production and consumption.

Keywords

Decision Theory Limited Liability Social Progress Strict Liability Default Rule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beaumol W.J. and W.E. Oates. The theory of environmental policy 2nd ed. Cambridge UP Cambridge, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooter R. and T. Ulen. Law and economics 2nd rev. ed. Reading Mass. Addison-Wesley, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dien Y., M. Llorry and R. Montmayeul. Investigations on the methodology of organisational accidents and lessons learned. Proc. JRC/ESReDA Seminar on Safety Investigation of Accidents, Eur. Commission DG JRC Institute for Energy Petten, 2003.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    French S. Decision theory. An introduction to the mathematics of rationality. Ellis Horwood/Wiley Chichester New York, 1986.MATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Horwitz M.J. The transformation of American law 1780-1860. Harvard UP Cambridge Mass., 1977.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Landes W.M. and R.A. Posner. The economic structure of tort law. Harvard UP Cambridge Mass., 1987.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lindley D.V. Making decisions 2nd rev. ed. Wiley Chichester, 1985Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Polinsky A.M. An introduction to Law and Economics 2nd ed. Little Brown Boston, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shavell S. Economic analysis of accident law, Harvard UP Cambridge Mass., 1987.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Velsen J.F.C. van. Relativity, universality and peaceful coexistence. Archiv für Rechtsund Sozialphilosophie 2000; 86/1: 88–108. See also http://www.lawoflogic.net/ Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zandvoort H. Controlling technology through law: the role of legal liability. Pp 247-250 in Brandt D. and J. Cernetic (eds.). Preprints of 7th IFAC Symposium on Automated Systems Based on Human Skill. Joint Design of Technology and Organisation June 15-17 2000 Aachen Germany. VDI/VDE-GMA Düsseldorf, 2000.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zandvoort H. Self determination, strict liability, and ethical problems in engineering. Pp. 219–243 in Kroes P. and A. Meijers eds. The Empirical Turn in the Philosophy of Technology. Elsevier Amsterdam, 2000.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zweigert K. and H. Kötz. An introduction to comparative law 2nd rev. ed. Clarendon Oxford, 1987.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Henk Zandvoort
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Technology, Policy and ManagementDelft University of TechnologyGA DelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations