Abstract
Traditional techniques of risk analysis have been fitted for the application to combined cycle power plants and the results of several studies are here presented. Although these plants are not normally concerned by the application of the Seveso II Directive, they are characterized by a certain degree of dangerousness and it is worth deepening the comprehension of their risk figures.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
CPQRA Guidelines for chemical process quantitative risk analysis. Center for chemical process safety of the AIChE. New York 1989.
Parozzi F., Valisi M. Electric generation. Risk Analysis. AEI. June 2002.
Lees F.P. Loss prevention in the process industries: hazard identification, assessment and control. Butterworth-Heinemann. Oxford, 1996.
Gas pipeline incidents. European gas pipeline incidents data group EGIG. 5th report 2002.
Swain A.D., Guttmann H.E. handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications — Final report NUREG/CR-1278-F, SAND80-0200, 1983.
OREDA-97. Offshore reliability data. 1997
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ballocco, G., Carpignano, A., Ponte, E. (2004). Insights for Quantitative Risk Assessment of Combined Cycle Power Plants. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U., Dang, V.N. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_307
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_307
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1057-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-410-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive