Skip to main content

Development of a Scenario Analysis Method for the Analysis of Complex Changes

  • Conference paper
Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management

Abstract

In this paper we describe a method for the analysis of safety effects of complex technical and organizational changes. The method is based on CRIOP 2003, which is a scenario analysis method focusing on the possibility and ability of the control room operators to handle crisis situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ă˜ien K, Guttormsen G, Hauge S, Sklet S, Steiro T, Monsen J. Experience with complex technical and organizational changes in the offshore petroleum industry. ESREL’03, Maastricht, 2003, pp 1197-1204

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ă˜ien K, Guttormsen G, Hauge S, Sklet S, Steiro T. Tomorrows HES analyses for the assessment of technical and organizational changes. Project report 2002. SINTEF Report STF38 F02423. SINTEF Industrial Management, Trondheim, 2002. (In Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ingstad O, Bodsberg L. CRIOP: a scenario-method for evaluation of the offshore control center. SINTEF Report STF75 A89028. SINTEF Safety & Reliability, Trondheim, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sten T, Bodsberg, L, Grefstad, JE. A scenario-method for evaluation of control centres at offshore oil and gas production installations. ESREL’99, Munich, 1999, pp 1303–1308

    Google Scholar 

  5. NORSOK Standard S-002. Work Environment. Rev. 3, November 1997. http://www. standard.no/standard/NORSOK_standards/2161/S-002.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  6. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Guidelines to regulations relating to design and outfitting of facilities etc. in the petroleum activities (the Facilities Regulations). 2002, http;//www.npd.no/regelverk/r2002/Innretningsforskriften_Veiledning_e.htm

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnsen SO, Bjørkli C, Steiro T, Fartum H, Haukenes H, Skriver J. CRIOP 2003: A scenario method for crisis intervention and operability analysis. SINTEF Report STF38 A03424. SINTEF Industrial Management, Trondheim, 2003

    Google Scholar 

  8. ISO 11064. Ergonomic design of control centres — Part 1: Principles for the design of control centres. 2001. — Part 2: Principles for the arrangement of control suites. 2001.-Parts 3: Control room layout. 2000

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Principles for alarm system design. YA-711, Feb 2001

    Google Scholar 

  10. Norwegian Petroleum Directorate. Human factors in control rooms — a revision method. 2003. (In Norwegian)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hollnagel E. Cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM). Elsevier, UK, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  12. øien K, Hauge S, Sklet S, Monsen J. A barrier change analysis method (BCAM). PSAM7/ESREL’04, Berlin, 2004. (To be published)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Norsk Hydro. Planning and execution of psycho-social analysis (Demand-Resource Analysis). NHT-OSL-WI-102, 2001

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ă˜ien, K., Bodsberg, L., Johnsen, S.O., Steiro, T., Monsen, J. (2004). Development of a Scenario Analysis Method for the Analysis of Complex Changes. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U., Dang, V.N. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_287

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_287

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1057-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-410-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics