Some Insights from HRA Related to Low Power and Shutdown Scenarios

  • Jaroslav Holý
Conference paper


In this contribution, some insights are given from detailed analysis of human factor contribution to the risk of low power and shutdown operation of WWER-440 Dukovany plant located in Czech Republic. This analysis was performed as a part of several contracts closed between Nuclear Research Institute Rez and NPP Dukovany in past years. The main focus of the effort was complete human reliability analysis addressing all points necessary for development and applications of LPS PSA model. Rather than giving complete description and results of the analysis performed, the intention of the contribution is to bring more general conclusions, which may be helpful for new developers of shutdown HRA.


Full Power Accident Scenario Human Reliability Nuclear Research Institute Probabilistic Safety Assessment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Seaver, D.A., Stillwell, W.G., Schwartz, J.P., Expert estimation of human error probabilities in nuclear power plant operations, a review of probability assessment and scaling, NUREG/CR-2255, May 1982Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dougherty E.M., Comparison of time reliability correlations, SAYC-NY-OR-07-368-14-1, Savannah River Laboratories, U.S.A., 1987Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Swain, A.D., Guttman, H., Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications, NUREG/CR-1278, 1983Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Swain, A.D., Accident sequence evaluation program human reliability — analysis procedures, NUREG/CR-4772, 1987Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Beare, A.N., Gaddy, C., Singh, A., Parry, G.W., An approach for assessment of the reliability of cognitive response for nuclear power plant Operating Crews”, in Proceedings of Probabilistic safety assessment and management, Beverley Hills, CA, Elsevier, 1991Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Humpreys, P.(editor), Human Reliability Assessors Guide, Section E, October 1988, RTS 88/95Q, UKAEAGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Embrey, D.E., Humpreys, P.C., Rosa, E.A., Kirwan, B., Rea, K., SLIM-MAUD: An approach to assessing human error probabilities using structured expert judgment, NUREG/CR-3518, 1984Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollnagel E., Cognitive Reliability and Error Analysis Method (CREAM), first edition, Elsevier, 1998Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Spurgin, A.J., Moieni, P., Interpretation of simulator data in the context of human reliability modeling, in G.Apostolakis (ed.) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, Elsevier 1991Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reece, W.J., Gilbert, B.G., Richards, R.E., Nuclear computerized library for assessing reactor reliability (NUCLARR), NUREG/CR-4639, 1994Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jaroslav Holý
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Risk and Reliability AnalysisNuclear Research Institute Rez (NRI)RezCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations