Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management pp 1474–1479Cite as

Simplified HRA modelling compared to detailed modelling, does it give any significant difference of the result for a PSA?

  • Conference paper

  • 30 Accesses

Abstract

This paper gives a description of the human reliability analysis (HRA) for a level 2 PSA using expert judgement assessment. It also gives a brief discussion between the use of a detailed, decomposed model and a holistic model using expert judgement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Swain A.D. & Guttmann H. E. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. NUREG/CR-1278, Sandia National Laboratories, USA, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pyy P. & Jacobsson P. Human Reliability Assessment by using Expert Judgement Methodology. Proceedings of the European Conference on Safety and Reliability-ESREL’ 98, Trondheim, Norway, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guidelines for Conducting Human Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment. IAEA Safety Series No. 50-P-10.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pyy, P. Human Reliability Analysis Methods for Probabilistic Safety Assessment (Ph D Thesis). VTT Automation, VTT Publication 422, Espoo, Finland, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pyy P. & Pulkkinen U. Use of Expert Judgment Methodology in the Analysis of Barsebäck Shutdown LOCA case. VTT report TAU-7008/97, Espoo, Finland, 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Box G. & Tiao G. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, USA, 1973.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systecon AB, Malmö, Sweden

    Peter Jacobsson

Authors
  1. Peter Jacobsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. TÜV Süddeutschland, Dudenstrasse 28, D-68167, Mannheim, Germany

    Cornelia Spitzer Dipl.-Math.

  2. Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate (HSK), CH-5232, Villigen-HSK, Switzerland

    Ulrich Schmocker PhD

  3. Paul Scherrer Institut (PSI), CH-5232, Villigen PSI, Switzerland

    Vinh N. Dang PhD

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jacobsson, P. (2004). Simplified HRA modelling compared to detailed modelling, does it give any significant difference of the result for a PSA?. In: Spitzer, C., Schmocker, U., Dang, V.N. (eds) Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_237

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-410-4_237

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-1057-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-410-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation