Simplified HRA modelling compared to detailed modelling, does it give any significant difference of the result for a PSA?

  • Peter Jacobsson
Conference paper


This paper gives a description of the human reliability analysis (HRA) for a level 2 PSA using expert judgement assessment. It also gives a brief discussion between the use of a detailed, decomposed model and a holistic model using expert judgement.


Operator Action Expert Judgement Probable Time Holistic Model Severe Accident 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Swain A.D. & Guttmann H. E. Handbook of Human Reliability Analysis with Emphasis on Nuclear Power Plant Applications. NUREG/CR-1278, Sandia National Laboratories, USA, 1983.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pyy P. & Jacobsson P. Human Reliability Assessment by using Expert Judgement Methodology. Proceedings of the European Conference on Safety and Reliability-ESREL’ 98, Trondheim, Norway, 1998.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Guidelines for Conducting Human Reliability Analysis in Probabilistic Safety Assessment. IAEA Safety Series No. 50-P-10.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pyy, P. Human Reliability Analysis Methods for Probabilistic Safety Assessment (Ph D Thesis). VTT Automation, VTT Publication 422, Espoo, Finland, 2000.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pyy P. & Pulkkinen U. Use of Expert Judgment Methodology in the Analysis of Barsebäck Shutdown LOCA case. VTT report TAU-7008/97, Espoo, Finland, 1997.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Box G. & Tiao G. Bayesian Inference in Statistical Analysis. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, USA, 1973.MATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Jacobsson
    • 1
  1. 1.Systecon ABMalmöSweden

Personalised recommendations