Advertisement

Evaluating and Managing Safety Barriers in Major Hazard Plants

  • Nijs Jan Duijm
  • Henning Boje Andersen
  • Andrew Hale
  • Louis Goossens
  • David Hourtolou

Abstract

The European ARAMIS project (Hourtolou and Salvi, 2003) is developing an integrated approach to the modelling and management of major hazard risks for major hazard plants. Central to the model being used is the concept of safety functions and barriers.

Keywords

Active Barrier Safety Management Safety Culture Bayesian Belief Network Accidental Risk 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Hourtolou, D. and Salvi, O., ARAMIS Project: development of an integrated accidental risk assessment methodology for industries in the framework of SEVESO II directive, Bedford, T. and Gelder, P. H. A. J. M. van, Safety & Reliability — ESREL 2003, pp. 829-836, 2003Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harms-Ringdahl, L., Assessment of safety functions at an industrial workplace — a case study, M.P.Cotham, D.W.Harvey, R.P.Rape, and J.Tait, Foresight and Precaution, ESREL 2000, Edinburgh, pp. 1373-1378, 2000Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rasmussen, J., Skills, rules, knowledge: signals, signs and symbols and other distinctions in human performance models, IEEE transaction systems, Man and Cybernetics, Vol. SMC-13, pp. 257–267, 1983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Redmill, F., Understanding the use, misuse and abuse of Safety Integrity Levels, paper presented at the English Safety-critical Systems Symposium, 8-10 February 2000, Southampton, UK, 2000Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duijm, N.J., Madsen, M.D., Andersen, H.B., Hale, A.R., Goossens, L., Londiche, H., and Debray, B., Assessing the effect of safety management efficiency on industrial risk, Bedford, T. and Gelder, P. H. A. J. M. van, Safety & Reliability — ESREL 2003, pp. 575-581, 2003Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooke, R.M. and Goossens, L., Procedures guide for structured expert judgement, EUR 18820, Brussels — Luxembourg, 2000Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guldenmund, F. W., The nature of safety culture: a review of theory and research, Safety Science, Vol. 34, pp. 215–257, 2000Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kirchsteiger, C., Major Accident Reporting System (MARS), An Electronic Documentation and Analysis System for Industrial Accidents Data — European Commission DG-JRC, Ispra, Italy, 2001Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nijs Jan Duijm
    • 1
  • Henning Boje Andersen
    • 1
  • Andrew Hale
    • 2
  • Louis Goossens
    • 2
  • David Hourtolou
    • 3
  1. 1.Systems Analysis DepartmentRise National LaboratoryRoskildeDenmark
  2. 2.Safety Science GroupDelft University of TechnologyDelftNetherlands
  3. 3.Accidental Risk DepartmentINERISVerneuil-en-HalatteFrance

Personalised recommendations