Experience on Applying the Developed Safety Assessment System to Various Industries

  • Ken-ichi Takano
  • Naoko Hasegawa
  • Ayako Hirose
Conference paper


For past seven years, CRIEPI has been conducting efforts to develop and make applications of a “safety assessment system” which enable to measure the safety level of organization. This report includes the frame of the system, assessment results obtained in various industries and its reliability.


Principal Component Analysis Nuclear Power Plant Safety Level Safety Management Organizational Climate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Reason, J. (1997). Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Takano, K. (2000/ JCO rinkai jiko niokeru sosikiyouin to saihatubousi (Criticality accidents and the future prevention of organizational accidents such as the JCO accident) (only in Japanese). Journal of the Japanese Society of Safety Engineering, 39(4), 227–233.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Litwin, G. H., & Stringer, R. A., Jr. (1968). Motivation and organizational climate. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Likert, R. (1959). A motivational approach to a modified theory of organization and management. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taniguchi, T., Tomioka, Y., Echizen, M., Enomoto, T., & Kondo, S. (1995). Management culture for safe and reliable operation of nuclear power plants in Japan. Proceedings of the International Topical Meeting on Safety Culture in Nuclear Installations, ANS & NEA, Vienna, 551-560.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hirose, A., Kojima, M., Hasegawa, N., & Takano, K. (2000). Second research study on the establishment of safety culture: A comparison of the organizational factors and safety levels of different types of industries (only in Japanese) (CRIEPI Report No. S99005). Tokyo: Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirose, A., Kojima, M., Hasegawa, N., & Takano, K. (2001). A comparative survey of the organizational factors and safety levels of companies (only in Japanese). Japanese Journal of Ergonomics 37(4), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Takano, K., Kojima, M., Hasegawa, N., & Hirose, A. (2001). Interrelationships between organizational factors and major safety indicators: A preliminary field study. In B. Wilpert & N. Itoigawa (Eds.), Safety culture in nuclear power operations (pp. 189–205). London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hasegawa, N., Hirose, A., Hayase, K., Tsuge, T., Sasou, K. & Takano, K. (2002). Development of the safety evaluation system in the respects of organizational factors and workers’ consciousness (Part 4)-Application of the System for Contract Companies —.(only in Japanese) (CRIEPI Report No. S02005). Tokyo: Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Murakami, Y. & Murakami, T. (2001). Syuyou 5 insi seikakukennsa handbook (Handbook of the assessment of personality based on big five model) (pp.45–62). Tokyo: Gakugei-Tosyo Co. Ltd.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ken-ichi Takano
    • 1
  • Naoko Hasegawa
    • 1
  • Ayako Hirose
    • 1
  1. 1.Ken-ichi Hayase and Kunihide Sasou Human Factors Research CenterCentral Institute of Electric Power Industry(CRIEPI)TokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations