Advertisement

Comparison of Organisational Cultures at Two NPP Maintenance Units — When is Maintenance Work Motivating and Meaningful?

  • Teemu Reiman
  • Pia Oedewald
  • Carl Rollenhagen
Conference paper

Abstract

Maintenance of a nuclear power plant (NPP) is a complex activity characterised by many coupled subsystems, uncertainty in the data available to the workers, mediated interaction via various tools and potentially high hazards. The activities in maintenance organisations include preventive maintenance, planned outages, modifications and different kinds of fault repairs. Correct working of the machinery and technology is critical to both plant safety and efficiency. Thus, appropriate maintenance strategies, efficient procedures and skilful work are the key factors of reliability at NPPs. How an organisation can achieve this?

Keywords

Nuclear Power Plant Preventive Maintenance Fault Repair Maintenance Task Maintenance Work 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cameron K.S. & Quinn R.E. Diagnosing and Changing Organisational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 1999Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hackman J.R. & Lawler E. E. Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology Monograph 1971; 55: 259–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hackman J.R. & Oldham G.R. Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology 1975; 60: 159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hackman J.R. & Oldham G.R. Work Redesign. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley, 1980Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Klemola U.-M. & Norros L. Analysis of the clinical behaviour of the anaesthetics: recognition of uncertainty as a basis for practice. Medical Education 1997; 31: 449–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oedewald P. & Reiman T. Core task modelling in cultural assessment: A case study in nuclear power plant maintenance. Cognition, Technology & Work 2003; 5: 283–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Reiman T., Oedewald P., Rollenhagen C. & Eriksson I. Contextual assessment of maintenance culture at Olkiluoto and Forsmark. NKS-R report, 2004Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Reiman T. & Oedewald P. Measuring maintenance culture and maintenance core task with CULTURE-questionnaire — a case study in the power industry, submittedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Reiman T. & Oedewald P. The Assessment of an Organisational Culture and Core Task in Complex Sociotechnical Systems, submittedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reiman T. & Norros L. Regulatory Culture: Balancing the Different Demands of Regulatory Practice in the Nuclear Industry. In Kirwan, B., Hale, A.R. & Hopkins, A. (eds.), Changing Regulation — Controlling Risks in Society. Oxford: Pergamon, 2002Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schein E. H. Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1985Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tabachnick B. G. & Fidell L. S. Using multivariate statistics. 4th edition. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 2001Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wahlström, B., Wilpert, B., Cox, S., Sola, R. & Rollenhagen, C. Learning organisations for nuclear safety. In proceedings of the 2002 IEEE 7th Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants. Scottsdale, Arizona, USA, 2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teemu Reiman
    • 1
  • Pia Oedewald
    • 1
  • Carl Rollenhagen
    • 2
  1. 1.VTT Industrial SystemsFinland
  2. 2.Mälardalen UniversitySweden

Personalised recommendations