Advertisement

Safety Culture Assessment — Methods and Indicators, Results of a German Research Project

  • Helga Schott
  • Hans-Peter Balfanz
  • Rolf-Diether Junge
  • Oliver Sträter
  • Beate Kallenbach-Herbert
  • Manfred Sickert
Conference paper

Abstract

The method for development of practical criteria for safety culture assessment — based on event orientated safety culture assessment — is a promising approach in the current situation. The event orientated assessment of the root causes of real events is based on the assumption that events in a nuclear power plant are indicators for deficiencies in safety culture.

Keywords

Nuclear Power Plant Safety Management Safety Culture Cause Analysis American Petroleum Institute 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. /INSAG 4/.
    INTERNATIONAL NUCLEAR SAFETY ADVISORY GROUP: Safety Culture, INSAG Series No. 4, IAEA, Vienna (1991)Google Scholar
  2. /Piper Alpha/.
    Lord Cullen: The public inquiry into the Piper Alpha Disaster, London, HMSO, 1991Google Scholar
  3. /Tokai-Mura/.
    Furuta K.: Panal: Human Factors in JCO Criticality Accident, PSAM 5, Osaka 12.2000Google Scholar
  4. /VGB-SBS-01/.
    VGB: VGB — SBS: Sicherheitsbewertungssystem, Kurzbeschreibung der Elemente, Essen, 11.2001Google Scholar
  5. /VGB-SBS-02/.
    Reinstrom G.: Sicherheitskulturbewertungssystem der Betreiber (VGB-SBS), in Symposium, Sicherheitsmanagement in der Kerntechnik, München, 30. / 31.10.2002.Google Scholar
  6. /HSK/.
    Humbel C., Frischknecht A.: Sicherheitsmanagement in den Schweizer Krenkraftwerken: Beschreibung, Erfassung und Bewertung durch die Sicherheitsbehörde, in TÜV-Symposium „Sicherheitsmanagement in der Kerntechnik“, 30./31.10.2002, MünchenGoogle Scholar
  7. /API/.
    American Petroleum Institute: Risk-Based Inspection — Base Resource Document, API Publication 581, May 2000Google Scholar
  8. /Reason/.
    Reason J., Managing the Risks of Organizational Accidents, Ashgate, Hampshire, 1997Google Scholar
  9. /Perrow/.
    Perrow C: Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies, Basic Books, USA, 1984Google Scholar
  10. /SOL/.
    Miller R., Wilpert B.: SOL — Sicherheit durch Organisationales Lernen— Ereignis analyse in der verfahrenstechnischen Industrie, 19. VDI-Tagung Technische Zuverlässigkeit (TTZ), Braunschweig, 10.97Google Scholar
  11. /CAHR/.
    Sträter O.: Assessment Of Cognitive Errors And Organizational Aspects Based On Evaluation Of Plant Experience, in: ANS — Proceedings of the international topical Meeting on PSA 1996. Park City, Utah (USA) 1996. ISBN: 0-89448-621-7. p. 245.Google Scholar
  12. /Balfanz 10-02/.
    Balfanz H.-P., Schott H.: Entwicklung praxisgerechter Bewertungskriterien für die Sicherheitskultur in deutschen Kernkraftwerken — Stand der Arbeiten und erste Ergebnisse, in Symposium, Sicherheitsmanagement in der Kerntechnik, München, 30. / 31.10. 2002.Google Scholar
  13. /Balfanz 12-02/.
    Balfanz H.-P., Linsenmaier B., Sträter O.: Development of Practical Criteria for Safety Culture Assessment in German Nuclear Power Plants, PSA 02 Conference, Detroit, 11.2002Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helga Schott
    • 1
  • Hans-Peter Balfanz
    • 2
  • Rolf-Diether Junge
    • 3
  • Oliver Sträter
    • 4
  • Beate Kallenbach-Herbert
    • 5
  • Manfred Sickert
    • 6
  1. 1.Bundesamt für StrahlenschutzSalzgitterGermany
  2. 2.Technischer Überwachungsverein Nord (TÜV Nord)HamburgGermany
  3. 3.TÜV Hannover/Sachsen-AnhaltHannoverGermany
  4. 4.Lehrstuhl für ErgonomieTechnische UniversitätMünchenGermany
  5. 5.Öko-InstitutDarmstadtGermany
  6. 6.Kernkraftwerk BrunsbüttelGermany

Personalised recommendations