Advertisement

Lessons learnt from a Mediterranean flood (Gard, September 2002)

  • Philippe Huet
  • Geneviève Baumont
Conference paper

Abstract

This paper presents the lessons learnt from the severe floods occurred in South of France. A large number of scientists were involved in the review organized by the French Ministry in charge of environment. Data were collected and are available for future scientific works. The characteristics of the framework and the main results are presented and discussed in an integrated tool prospect.

Keywords

Return Period Flood Risk Crisis Management Severe Flood Torrential Rain 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Synthesis of the lessons learnt and recommandations (in french language): http://www.environnement.gouv.fr/infoprat/Publications/svntheses-ige/2003/media/cruesgard.pdfGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huet P. Duband D, Neppel J.L, Coeur D. Llasat C., Brun E, Benoit G. Ledoux B. Valarié P, Gresillon J.M. Baumont G. Inondations en Languedoc Roussillon du 9 et 10 septembre 2002, Quels enseignements un an après ? Documentation Française 2004, à paraîtreGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Colbeau-Justin L, Cartier S, Ledoux B, et Wybo J.L, Etudes psycho-sociologiques concernant l’information et l’alerte pendant l’épisode extrême du 8 et 9 septembre 2002 (Crues du Gard et de l’Hérault) à paraître.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sinclair Desgagné B. Retour d’expérience de la grande crise de la tempête de verglas, survenue du 5 au 9 janvier 1998 au Canada, Cahier du Programme Risques Collectifs et Situations de crises du CNRSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pulkkinen U, Simola K. An expert panel approach to support risk informed decision making, VTT Automation, November 2000 STUK-YTO-TR172Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jonkman B., Van Gelder P., Vrijling H. Flood risk calculated with different risk measures IHE Course on Probabilistic Design 2003 http://www.waterbouw.tudelft.nl/public/gelder/paper101c.pptGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Davoine P.A, Martin H., Trouillon A., Cœur D., Lang M., M. Bariendos, C. Llasat, Systematic, Palaeoflood and Historical data for the improvement of flood Risk Estimation, “SPHERE” ProjectGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Llasat M.C., Barriendos M, Barrera A. & Rigo T. [2003] dans PHEFRA — Palaeofloods, Historical Data & Climatic Variability: Applications in Flood Risk Assessment, Proceedings of the International Workshop held at Barcelona, Spain, October 2002Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    G Baumont, F. Ménage, J.R Schneiter, A. Spurgin, A. Vogel. Method for quantifying human and organizational factors in accident management, using Decision Tree The HORAAM method. Reliability engineering & system safety, oct 2000, Elsevier.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    http://www.srh.noaa.gov/lmrfc/education/safetv.shtml#tvpesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    http://weathereve.kgan.com/cadet/flood/rules.html and http://www.environment-agencv.gov.uk/subiects/flood/floodwarningGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    http://www.environnement.gouv.fr/actua/proposit/approsit.htmGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philippe Huet
    • 1
  • Geneviève Baumont
    • 1
  1. 1.Ministère de l’Ecologie et du Développement DurableParisFrance

Personalised recommendations