Advertisement

Integrated Barrier Analysis in Operational Risk Assessment in Offshore Petroleum Operations

  • Jan Erik Vinnem
  • Terje Aven
  • Stein Hauge
  • Jorunn Seljelid
  • Gunnar Veire

Abstract

The BORA project is aimed at detailed and quantitative modeling of barrier performance, including barriers to prevent occurrence of initiating events, and barriers to avoid or reduce consequences. Challenges related to the modeling are reviewed, and some solutions are suggested.

Keywords

Fault Tree Ignition Point Barrier Performance Reduce Release Quantitative Risk Analysis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Vinnem, J.E., Aven, T., Hundseid, H., Vassmyr, K.A., Vollen, F., Øien, K. Risk assessments for Offshore Installations in the Operational Phase. Presented at ESREL2003, Maastricht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vinnem, J.E. et.al. Operational Risk analysis — Total analysis of physical and non-physical barriers, BORA pre project report, 16.10.2003Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sandøy, M., et al. Risk-Based Well Control Planning: The Integration of Random and Known Quantities in a computerized Risk Management Tool, SPE 68447, Presented at SPE/ICoTA Coiled Tubing Roundtable, Houston, Texas, 7-8 March 2001Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Thomassen, O., Sorum, M. Mapping and monitoring the safety level SPE 73923, presented at SPE International Conference on Health, Safety and Environment in Oil and Gas Exploration and Production, Kuala Lumpur, 20-22. March, 2002Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vinnem, J.E., Veire, G., Heide Knudsen, B., Aven, T. A method for developing and structuring risk activity indicators for major accidents, to be presented at ESREL2004/-PSAM7 conference, Berlin, June, 2004Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Private communication with Robert Miles, HSEGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bäckström, O. Pilotprosjekt Felträdsanalys för Statfjord A, Relcon rapport 99161-R-005, 20.5.2003Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    ‘Working together for safety’ web page info http://www.samarbeidforsikkerhet.-no/index.html?infoPage=oppslag.html&id=2&siteID=&frameID=3&languageCode=ENGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nilsen, T., Jacobsen, G.S. and Aven, T. Requirements and principles for cause analysis in QRA — with applications ESREL, Edinburgh, pp. 641-646Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    E. Pate-Cornell and Murphy, M. Human and management factors in probabilistic risk analysis: the SAM approach and observations from recent application. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 53, 115–126.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murphy, M. and Pate-Cornell, E. The SAM framework: Modelling the effects of management factors on human behavior in risk analysis. Risk Analysis. 16, 501–515Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papazoglou, I. A. and Aneziris, O. On the quantification of the effects of organizational and management factors in chemical installations, Reliability Engineering and system safety, 63, 33–46Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jan Erik Vinnem
    • 1
  • Terje Aven
    • 2
  • Stein Hauge
    • 3
  • Jorunn Seljelid
    • 4
  • Gunnar Veire
    • 5
  1. 1.Preventor/Stavanger University CollegeBryneNorway
  2. 2.Stavanger University CollegeStavangerNorway
  3. 3.SINTEF Technology ManagementTrondheimNorway
  4. 4.Safetec NordicTrondheimNorway
  5. 5.StatoilStavangerNorway

Personalised recommendations