Advertisement

Chasing Shadows: Science Journalism and the Politics of Risk

  • Stuart Allan
Conference paper

Abstract

The world of science, judging from some media portrayals, is a world of white-coated boffins peering through microscopes, laboratory benches with bubbling flasks set above flickering Bunsen burners, and racks of test-tubes and petri dishes emitting strange aromas. It is an insular world, cut off from the real world outside the laboratory window. The media tell us that this world of science is mind-numbingly boring and mundane in the repetition of its daily routines. Except, that is, for those rare moments when with a terrifyingly abrupt flash of insight (in the time it takes to, say, split an atom) the very future of humankind might suddenly appear to be hanging in the balance. If in the wrong hands science can be used to evil ends, in the right hands it is proclaimed to be our salvation. Scientists themselves tend to be represented as being decent, high-minded citizens tirelessly committed to the eternal pursuit of truth on behalf of their society. This endeavour, it follows, is a cornerstone of modem democracy, helping to make the world an organized, ordered system. Still, we are warned, there are exceptions. Lurking among their ranks are those intent on exploiting scientific knowledge for ominous purposes. These scientists, having been corrupted by greed or driven mad by a lust for power, are dangerously out of control.

Keywords

Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy News Medium News Story Select Committee Media Portrayal 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adam, B. (2000) The media timescapes of BSE news, in S. Allan, B. Adam and C. Carter (eds) Environmental Risks and the Media. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. (1999) Cars, cholera, cows, and contaminated land: virtual risk and the management of uncertainty, in R. Bate (ed.) What Risk? Science, Politics and Public Health. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
  3. Allan, S. (2002) Media, Risk and Science. Buckingham and Philadelphia: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  5. Collins, H. and Pinch, T. (1998) The Golem at Large. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Dunbar, R. (1995) The Trouble with Science. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  7. Friedman, S.M., Dunwoody, S. and Rogers, C.L. (eds) (1999) Communicating Uncertainty. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  8. Hilgartner, S. (2000) Science on Stage. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Horton, R. (1999) Genetically modified foods: ‘absurd’ concern or welcome dialogue? Lancet, 354: 1312.Google Scholar
  10. Jasanoff, S. (1998) Book review, Public Understanding of Science, 7 (4): 354–356.Google Scholar
  11. Nelkin, D. (1995) Selling Science: How the Press Covers Science and Technology, Second Edition. New York: W.H. Freeman.Google Scholar
  12. Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (1996) Safety in Numbers? Report 81. London: House of Commons.Google Scholar
  13. Scanlon, E., Whitelegg, E. and S. Yates (eds) (1999) Communicating Science, Reader 2. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Select Committee on Science and Technology, House of Lords (2000) Science and Society. London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stuart Allan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Cultural Studies University of the West of EnglandBristolUK

Personalised recommendations