If I had a Robot at Home... Peoples’ Representation of Domestic Robots

  • M. Scopelliti
  • M. V. Giuliani
  • A. M. D’Amico
  • F. Fornara


The decrease in childbirth and the great increase in life expectancy represent typical demographic trends in industrialised countries. These tendencies make more concrete the issue regarding elderly people: the more they grow old, the more they are likely to need medical, social and personal care services. Nursing home care services are probably the most important example in terms of social costs, not only because they are extremely expensive from an economic point of view, but also because they determine a forced relocation of elderly people. To be compelled to live in a new place, completely depending on other people’s assistance, has unquestionably a deep psychological impact (Hormuth, 1990): probably more difficult to assess than the economic expenditures, but definitely not less significant. Elderly people undoubtedly prefer living independently in a familiar domestic and residential setting. Anyway, a new series of problems arises, due to the shortage of residential infrastructures and facilities and the lack of home service workers compared to the large number of people who need assistance. As for domestic settings, in addition, the psychological impact of a long term home care assistance is still far from well understood: assistance provided by other people can generate a stronger negative influence upon final users, in that they may perceive a loss of control in their living space, and they may look at home service caregivers as privacy intruders. This condition may represent a menace to self-esteem and to the integrity of personal identity.


Elderly People Assistive Technology Smart Home Multiple Correspondence Analysis Domestic Robot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Baltus G, Fox D, Gemperl F, Goetz J, Hirsch T, Magaritis D et al. Toward personal service robots for the elderly. In: WIRE’ 00. Available at: http://www.cs.emu.ed/~nursebot/web/papers.html
  2. Breakwell G (1986) Coping with threatened identity. London: MethuenGoogle Scholar
  3. Cesta A, Bahadori S, Cortellessa G, Grisetti G, Giuliani MV, Iocchi L, et al. (2003) The RoboCare project. Cognitive systems for the care of the elderly. In: Conference on Aging, Disability and Independence. Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. Dennett DC (1996) Kinds of minds. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  5. Doughty K (1999) Can a computer be a carer? In: 9th Alzheimer Europe Meeting & Alzheimer’s Disease Society Conference, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffy BR (2003) Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42: 177–190MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Elliot R (1991) Assistive technology for the frail elderly: An introduction and overview. Washington: U.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesGoogle Scholar
  8. Fong T, Nourbakhsh I (2003) Socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42: 139–141MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gitlin LN (1995) Why older people accept or reject assistive technology. Generations, Journal of the American Society on Aging 19: 41–46Google Scholar
  10. Hirsch T, Forlizzi J, Hyder E, Goetz J, Stroback J, Kurtz C (2000) The ELDer Project: Social and emotional factors in the design of eldercare technologies. In: Conference on Universal Usability. Arlington, Virginia, USAGoogle Scholar
  11. Hormuth SE (1990) The ecology of self: Relocation and self-concept change. Cambridge: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
  12. Khan Z (1998) Attitude towards intelligent service robots. Technical Report No. TRITA- NA-P9821. Stockholm: NADA, KTHGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahoney RM (1997) Robotic products for rehabilitation: Status and strategy. In: Proceedings of ICORR ’97 - International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics. Bath, UK. Available at: http://www.bath.ac.uk/bime/icorrproc/mahoneyl.pdf Google Scholar
  14. Monk AF, Baxter G (2002) Would you trust a computer to run your home? Dependability issues in smart homes for older adults. In: A New Research Agenda for Older Adults, Workshop at BCS HCI 2002, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  15. Nass C, Moon Y (2000) Machines and mindlessness: Social response to computers. Journal of Social Issues 56: 81–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Oestreicher L, Huttenrauch H, Severinsson-Eklund K (1999) Where are you going little robot? CHI 99 Basic Research Symposium, In: ACM CHI’99. Available at: http://www.nada.kth.se/iplab/hri/publications/chi99
  17. Steinfeld E, Shea S (1993) Enabling home environment: Identifying barriers to independence. Technology and Disability 2(4): 69–79Google Scholar
  18. Stewart LM, Kaufman SB (1993) High-Tech home care: Electronic devices with implications for the design of living environments. In: Life-span Design of Residential Environments for an Aging Populations. AARP: Washington DC, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Scopelliti
  • M. V. Giuliani
  • A. M. D’Amico
  • F. Fornara

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations