Robot Technology in Rehabilitation and Support — State of the Art

  • J. A. van Woerden
  • G. J. Gelderblom
  • B. J. F. Driessen
Conference paper



Rehabilitation Robotics is the discipline that deals with applying robot technology to rehabilitation and the support of disabled persons. In the robotics world, that moved from the idea of robotics (1920) via the introduction in factories (1960), Rehabilitation Robotics can be characterised by the development of service robots (1990 onwards) and is still in an infant stadium.


Ubiquitous Computing Assistive Technology Disable Person Pervasive Computing Service Robot 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aarts E, Ambient Intelligence. The paradigm Philips.Google Scholar
  2. Bühler C (1997) Robotics for rehabilitation. A European (?) Perspective. In: Proceedings ICORR 1997, University of Bath, UKGoogle Scholar
  3. Driessen BJF, van Woerden JA, ten Kate TK, Versluis AHG (2003) Developing and evaluating intelligent environments for disabled and elderly people. In: Proceedings of ICOST 2003, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. Gelderblom GJ, Cremers G, Soede M(2003) Rehabilitation robotics - The state of the art in 2003. CD-Rom, iRv, Hoensbroek, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  5. Graf B, Hans M, Kubacki J, Schraft R D (2002) Robotic home assistant - Care-O-Bot. In: IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society: Conference Proceedings 24th Annual International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology SocietyGoogle Scholar
  6. Helal S(2003) Assistive environments for successful ageing. In: ICO ST 03, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  7. Helal S, Winkler B, Lee C, Kaddoura Y, Ran L, Giraldo C, Kuchibhota S, Mann W (2003) Enabling location aware pervasive computing applications for the elderly. In:Proceedings of the first IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and CommunicationsGoogle Scholar
  8. Hesse S, Uhlenbrock D (2000) A mechanised gait trainer for restoration of gait. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 37(6)Google Scholar
  9. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Volpe BT, Aisen ML, Edelstein L, Diels C (1999) Robot-aided neuro- rehabilitation in stroke: three year follow-up. In: Proceedings of ICORR 99, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Mahoney R M (1977) Robotic products for rehabilitation: status and strategy. Proceedings ICORR 1997 pp 12-17. IEEE, Robotics and Automation Society. Available at: Google Scholar
  11. Park KH, Bien ZZ (2003) Intelligent sweet home for assisting the elderly and the handicapped. In: Proceedings of ICOST 2003, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  12. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole AN, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ (2000) Understanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: Progress with the ARM Guide. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development 37 (6): 653–662Google Scholar
  13. Takahashi CD, Scheidt RA, Reinkensmeyer DJ (2001) Impedance control and internal model formation when reaching in a rondomly varying dynamical environment. Journal of Neurophysiogology 86: 1047–1051Google Scholar
  14. Wason G, Gunderson J, Graves S, Felder R (2001) An assistive robotic agent for pedestrian mobility. International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Montreal, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  15. Weiser M (1991)The computer for the 21st century. Scientific American 256(3): 94–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang D, Whang X, Leman K, Huang W (2003) OSGI based service infrastructure for context aware connected homes. In: Proceedings of ICOST 2003, Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  17. UpnP Forum. Homepage

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. van Woerden
  • G. J. Gelderblom
  • B. J. F. Driessen

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations