As Long as They Don’t Know Where I Live: Information Disclosure Strategies for Managing Identity in Second LifeTM

Part of the Springer Series in Immersive Environments book series (SSIE)


Thirty Second LifeTM residents were interviewed about their perceptions of the boundary between their virtual world and material world identities and the practices they used to share or to conceal identity information across that boundary. A range of stances toward the boundary – from completely open to completely closed – was found, although even the people who were the most open kept some kind of boundary. Stances toward the boundary and choices about sharing information were related to two broad motivations – relationship formation and reputation maintenance. The interview data is discussed in terms of social penetration theory, social identity theory, theories of stigma, theories of the self and theories of ­anonymity. Ethical issues in virtual world research are also addressed. Suggestions for future research on identity in virtual environments, for the design of virtual environments, and implications for modern conceptualizations of the self are discussed.


Virtual Environment Virtual World Material World Social Identity Theory Jigsaw Puzzle 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors thank O. Candelario, Mary Ellen Gordon, Peggy Daniels Lee, and Harriet J. McLeod for helpful comments on this chapter.


  1. Altman, I., Taylor, D.: Social Penetration: The Development of Interpersonal Relationships. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1973)Google Scholar
  2. Anonymous: To reveal or not to reveal: a theoretical model of anonymous communication. Commun. Theor. 8, 381–407 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banaji, M.R., Prentice, D.A.: The self in social contexts. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 45, 297–332 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bargh, J., McKenna, K.: The internet and social life. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55, 573–590 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bargh, J., McKenna, K., Fitzsimons, G.: Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the internet. J. Soc. Issues 58, 33–48 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Ze’ev, A.: Privacy, emotional closeness, and openness in cyberspace. Comput. Hum. Behav. 19, 451–467 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boellstorff, T.: Coming of Age in Second Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2008)Google Scholar
  8. Brewer, M.B.: The social self: on being the same and different at the same time. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 17, 475–482 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Caspi, A., Gorsky, P.: Online deception: prevalence, motivation, and emotion. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 9, 54–59 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christopherson, K.M.: The positive and negative implications of anonymity in internet social ­interactions: “On the internet, nobody knows you’re a dog”. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, ­3038–3056 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Collins, N., Miller, L.: Self-disclosure and liking: a meta-analytic review. Psychol. Bull. 116, 457–475 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Derlega, V.J., Chaikin, A.L.: Privacy and self-disclosure in social relationships. J. Soc. Issues 33, 102–115 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Derlega, V.J., Wilson, M., Chaikin, A.L.: Friendship and disclosure reciprocity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 34, 578–582 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dietz-Uhler, B., Bishop-Clark, C., Howard, E.: Formation of and adherence to a self-disclosure norm in an online chat. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 8, 114–120 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frye, N.E., Dornisch, M.M.: When is trust not enough? The role of perceived privacy of communication tools in comfort with self-disclosure. Comput. Hum. Behav. 26, 1120–1127 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Geertz, C.: Local Knowledge: Further Essays on Interpretive Anthropology. Basic Books, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  17. Gergen, K.J.: The Saturated Self. Basic Books, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  18. Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Anchor Books, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  19. Goffman, E.: Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. Simon & Schuster, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  20. Hancock, J.T.: Digital deception: when, where and how people lie online. In: McKenna, K., Postmes, T., Reips, U., Joinson, A.N. (eds.) Oxford Handbook of Internet Psychology, pp. 287–301. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2007)Google Scholar
  21. Jessup, L.M., Connolly, T., Tansik, D.A.: Toward a theory of automated group work: the deindividuating effects of anonymity. Small Gr. Res. 21, 333–348 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson, D.W., Noonan, M.P.: Effects of acceptance and reciprocation of self-­disclosures on the development of trust. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 19, 411–416 (1972)Google Scholar
  23. Joinson, A.N., Reips, U., Buchanan, T., Schofield, C.B.P.: Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Hum-Comput. Interact. 25, 1–24 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennedy, H.: Beyond anonymity, or future directions for internet identity research. New Media Soc. 8, 859–876 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lifton, R.J.: The Protean Self: Human Resilience in an Age of Fragmentation. Basic Books, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  26. Markus, H.R., Kitayama, K.: Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98, 224–253 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Markus, H., Nurius, P.: Possible selves. Am. Psychol. 41, 954–969 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. McKenna, K.Y.A., Green, A.S., Gleason, M.E.J.: Relationship formation on the internet: what’s the big attraction? J. Soc. Issues 58, 9–31 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLeod, P.L.: Anonymity and consensus in computer-supported group decision making. In: Griffith, T.L. (ed.) Research on Managing Groups and Teams: Technology, pp. 175–204. JAI Press, Stamford (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nosek, B.A., Banaji, M.R., Greenwald, A.G.: E-research: ethics, security, design, and control in psychological research on the internet. J. Soc. Issues 58, 161–176 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Omarzu, J.: A disclosure decision model: determining how and when individuals will self-disclose. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4, 174–185 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Parks, M., Floyd, K.: Making friends in cyberspace. J. Commun. 46, 80–97 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Postmes, T., Spears, R., Sakhel, K., de Groot, D.: Social influence in computer-mediated communication: the effects of anonymity on group behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 27, 1243–1254 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Preece, J.: Online Communities: Designing Usability, Supporting Sociability. Wiley, New York (2000)Google Scholar
  35. Rains, S.A.: The impact of anonymity on perceptions of source credibility and influence in ­computer-mediated group communication: a test of two competing hypotheses. Commun. Res. 34, 100–125 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rheingold, H.: The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1993)Google Scholar
  37. Rubin, Z.: Disclosing oneself to a stranger: reciprocity and its limits. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 11, 233–260 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Smith, M.A., Kollock, P.: Communities in Cyberspace. Routledge, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  39. Tajfel, H.: The social psychology of intergroup relations. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 33, 1–39 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin, W., Worchel, S. (eds.) Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterrey (1979)Google Scholar
  41. Tanis, M., Postmes, T.: Two faces of anonymity: paradoxical effects of cues to identity in CMC. Comput. Hum. Behav. 23, 955–970 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, T.L.: Life in virtual worlds: plural existence, multimodalities, and other online research challenges. Am. Behav. Sci. 43(3), 436–449 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Teske, J.A.: Cyberpsychology, human relationship, and our virtual interiors. Zygon 37, 677–700 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Thibaut, J.W., Kelley, H.H.: The Social Psychology of Groups. Wiley, New York (1959)Google Scholar
  45. Turkle, S.: Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  46. Valacich, J.S., Jessup, L.M., Dennis, A.R., Nunamaker Jr., J.F.: A conceptual framework of ­anonymity in group support systems. Group Decis. Negot. 1, 219–241 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vrooman, S.S.: The art of invective: performing identity in cyberspace. New Media Soc. 4(1), 51–70 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walther, J.B.: Computer-mediated communication: impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun. Res. 23(1), 3–43 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wheeless, L.R., Grotz, J.: The measurement of trust and its relationship to self-disclosure. Hum. Commun. Res. 3, 250–257 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Worthy, M., Gary, A.L., Kahn, G.M.: Self-disclosure as an exchange process. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 13(1), 59–63 (1969)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Yee, N., Bailenson, J.N., Ducheneaut, N.: The proteus effect: implications of transformed digital self-representation on online and offline behavior. Commun. Res. 36, 285–312 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London Limited 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of CommunicationCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations