Skip to main content

A Multiobjective Optimisation Approach for the Conceptual Design of Frame Structures

  • Conference paper
Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture V

Abstract

This paper explores the potential for using optimisation methods in the conceptual design of frame structures. The key elements of our approach are a randomised search based optimisation method (to simulate creativity), a generative structural shape grammar (to allow different configurations to be explored), and a multiobjective optimisation approach (to identify competing concepts occupying different parts of the trade-off surface). The results presented for a modified version of a classic structural optimisation problem demonstrate the success of this approach in exploring a multiplicity of different design configurations and presenting the designer with a variety of Pareto-optimal concepts worthy of further consideration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shea K, (2001) An Approach to Multiobjective Optimisation for Parametric Synthesis. Procs. 13th Int. Conf. Engineering Design, Glasgow, UK; 203–210.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kirkpatrick S, Gerlatt CD Jr, Vecchi MP, (1983) Optimization by Simulated Annealing. Science, 220; 671–680.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Cagan J, Mitchell WJ, (1993) Optimally Directed Shape Generation by Shape Annealing. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 20(1); 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cagan J, Mitchell WJ, (1994) A Grammatical Approach to Network Flow Synthesis. IFIP Transactions B-Applications in Technology, 18; 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Reddy GM, Cagan J, (1995) Optimally Directed Truss Topology Generation Using Shape Annealing. Journal of Mechanical Design, 117(1); 206–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown KN, Cagan J, (1997) Optimized Process Planning by Generative Simulated Annealing. AI EDAM-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 11(3); 219–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Shea K, Cagan J, (1997) Innovative Dome Design: Applying Geodesic Patterns with Shape Annealing. AI EDAM-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 11(5); 379–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goldberg DE, (1989) Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addison Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schwefel H-P, (1995) Evolution and Optimum Seeking. Wiley Interscience, John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gips J, Stiny G, (1980) Production Systems and Grammars: A Uniform Characterization. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 7(4); 399–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stiny G, (1980) Introduction to Shape and Shape Grammars. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 7(3); 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shea K, Cagan J, (1999) The Design of Novel Roof Trusses with Shape Annealing: Assessing the Ability of a Computational Method in Aiding Structural Designers with Varying Design Intent. Design Studies, 20; 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suppapitnarm A, Shea K, Parks GT, Clarkson P J, (2000) Topological Optimisation of Bicycle Frames Using a Structural Shape Grammar. Procs. 2nd ASMO UK/ISSMO Conf. Engineering Design Optimization, Swansea, UK; 211–218.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Suppapitnarm A, Seffen KA, Parks GT, Clarkson P J, (2000) A Simulated Annealing Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimisation. Engineering Optimization, 33(10); 59–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zitzler E, Thiele L, (1999) Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: A Comparative Case Study and the Strength Pareto Approach. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3(4); 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Corne DW, Knowles JD, Oates MJ, (2000) The Pareto Envelope-based Selection Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization, Procs. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI, Paris, France; 839–848.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deb K, Agrawal S, Pratab A, Meyarivan T (2000) A Fast Elitist Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-Objective Optimization: NSGA-II. Procs. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI, Paris, France; 849–858.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Knowles JD, Corne DW, (2000) Approximating the Nondominated Front Using the Pareto Archived Evolution Strategy. Evolutionary Computation, 8 (2); 149–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hansen MP, (1997) Tabu Search in Multiobjective Optimisation: MOTS. Procs. 13th Int. Conf. Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Cape Town, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bennage WA, Dhingra AK, (1995) Single and Multiobjective Structural Optimization in Discrete-continuous Variables Using Simulated Annealing. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 38(16); 2753–2773.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Gobat JI, Atkinson DC, (1995) FElt: User’s Guide and Reference Manual. University of California, San Diego, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shea K, Cagan J, (1999) Languages and Semantics of Grammatical Discrete Structures. AI EDAM-Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design Analysis and Manufacturing, 13(4); 241–251.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stiny G, Gips J, (1978) Algorithmic Aesthetics. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Suppapitnarm .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Suppapitnarm, A., Parks, G.T., Shea, K., Clarkson, P.J. (2002). A Multiobjective Optimisation Approach for the Conceptual Design of Frame Structures. In: Parmee, I.C. (eds) Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture V. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-345-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-345-9_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-605-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-345-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics