Pareto Solutions of Multipoint Design of Supersonic Wings Using Evolutionary Algorithms

  • Shigeru Obayashi


Design datamining is demonstrated through multipoint aerodynamic design of supersonic wings. Tradeoff information for the design is gathered by Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms (MOEAs) and visualized by Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs). Four design objectives are considered: Aerodynamic drags are minimized at both supersonic and transonic cruise conditions under lift constraints. Bending and pitching moments are also minimized for structure and stability considerations. MOEAs are first performed by using 72 design variables. SOM is then applied to map the resulting Pareto solutions obtained in the four dimensional objective function space to two dimensions. This reveals global tradeoffs between four design objectives. Furthermore, the relations between design variables are mapped onto another SOM. The resulting SOMs are confirmed to perform aerodynamic design datamining properly.


Design Variable Pareto Front Pareto Solution Pitching Moment Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sakata K (2000) Supersonic Experimental Airplane Program in NAL and its CFD-Design Research Demand. 2nd SST-CFD Workshop, pp 53–56.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vicini A and Quagliarella D (1997) Inverse and Direct Airfoil Design Using a Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm. AIAA Journal 35(9): 1499–1505.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poloni C and Mosetti G (1996) Aerodynamic Shape Optimization by means of a Hybrid Genetic Algorithm. Z. anew. Math. Mech., 73(3):247–250.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Parmee IC and Watson AH (1999) Preliminary Airframe Design Using Co-Evolutionary Multiobjective Genetic Algorithms. GECCO-99: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp 1657–1665.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Obayashi S, Sasaki D, Takeguchi Y and Hirose N (2000) Multiobjective Evolutionary Computation for Supersonic Wing-Shape Optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 4(2): 182–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sasaki D, Obayashi S and Nakahashi K (2001) Navier-Stokes Optimization of Supersonic Wings with Four Design Objectives Using Evolutionary Algorithm. AIAA-2001-2531.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kohonen T (1995) Self-Organizing Maps. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hollmen J (2001 ) Self-Organizing Map, <>, last access on February 6, 2002.
  9. 9.
    Fonseca CM and Fleming PJ (1993) Genetic Algorithms for Multiobjective Optimization: Formulation, Discussion and Generalization. Proc. of the 5th ICGA, pp 416–423.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Obayashi S, Takahashi S and Takeguchi Y (1998) Niching and Elitist Models for MOGAs. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN V, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Vol 1498, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 260–269.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eshelman LJ and Schaffer JD (1993) Real-coded genetic algorithms and interval schemata. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms2, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, Inc., San Mateo, pp 187–202.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Arakawa M and Hagiwara I (1998) Development of Adaptive Real Range (ARRange) Genetic Algorithms. JSME International Journal, Series C, 41(4):969–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oyama A, Obayashi S and Nakamura S (2000) Real-Coded Adaptive Range Genetic Algorithm Applied to Transonic Wing Optimization. Parallel Problem Solving from Nature — PPSN VI, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol 1917, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 712–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Obayashi S and Guruswamy GP (1995) Convergence Acceleration of an Aeroelastic Navier-Stokes Solver. AIAA Journal, 33(6): 1134–1141.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eudaptics software gmbh. <>, last access on February 6, 2002. (Japanese version: <>)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2002

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Fluid Science, Tohoku UniversitySendaiJAPAN

Personalised recommendations