Extraction of Emerging Multi-Objective Design Information from COGA Data

  • J. A. R Abraham
  • I. C. Parmee
Conference paper


The paper describes further developments of the interactive evolutionary design concept relating to the emergence of mutually inclusive regions of high performance solutions relating to differing objectives from cluster-oriented genetic algorithm (COGAs) output. These common regions are further defined by the application of clustering algorithms and relevant variable analysis. The multi-objective output of the COGA is then compared to output from a strength Pareto evolutionary algorithm (SPEA-II).


Pareto Front Information Gain Objective Space Adaptive Filter Pareto Frontier 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. [1]
    Parmee I C, Watson A H, (1999), “Preliminary Airframe Design Using Co-Evolutionary Multi-objective Genetic Algorithms”, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Congress (GECCO).Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Cvetkovic D, Parmee I C, (1999), “Preferences and their application in Evolutionary Multi-Objective Optimization”, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6(1), 2001, pp 442–47.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Parmee I C, (2002), “Improving Problem Definition through Interactive Evolutionary Computation”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacture-Special Issue: Human-computer Interaction in Engineering Contexts 16(3).Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Parmee I C, Cvetkovic D, Watson A H, Bonham C R, (2000), “Multi-Objective Satisfaction within an Interactive Evolutionary Design Enviroment”, Evolutionary Computation 8 (MIT 2000), pp 197–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    Parmee I C, (1996), “The Maintenance of Search Diversity for Effective Design Space Decomposition using Cluster Oriented Genetic Algorithms (COGAs) and Multi-Agent Strategies (GAANT)”, Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Adaptive Computing in Engineering Design and Control, PEDC, University of Plymouth, pp 128–138.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Parmee I C, and Bonham C R, (2000), “Towards the support of innovative conceptual design through interactive designer / evolutionary computing strategies”, Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacture, 14. Cambridge Press, pp 3–16.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Parmee I C, (1996b), “Cluster Oriented Genetic Algorithms (COGAs) for Identification of High Performance Regions of Design Spaces”, First International Conference on Evolutionary Computation and Applications, EvCA 96, Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow; pp 66–75.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Bonham C R, Parmee I C, (2000), “Improving the Robustness of COGA: The Dynamic Adaptive filter”, In Evolutionary Design and Manufacture, Selected papers from the 4th International Conference on Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture, April 2000, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Bonham C R, Parmee I C, (1999), “Improving the Performance of Cluster Oriented Genetic Algorithms (COGAs)”, In Proceedings of IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Washnigton DC, pp 554–561.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Webb E., (1997), “MINICAPS-A Simplified version of CAPS for use as a research tool”, Unclassified Report BAe-WOA-RP-GEN-11313, British Aerospace.Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    Cvetkovic D, Parmee I C, (2002), “Agent-based Support within an Interactive Evolutionary Design”, Proceeding of Fifth International Conference on Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture, Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  12. [12]
    Arvin L B, Langley P, (1997), “Selection of Relevant Feature and Examples in Machine Learning”, Artificial Intelligence, 10:245–247.Google Scholar
  13. [13]
    Han J, Kamber M, (2001), “Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques”, Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California.Google Scholar
  14. [14]
    Aggarwal C C, Yu P S, (2002), “Outlier Detection for High Dimensional Data”, In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on the Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, pages 15–26.Google Scholar
  15. [15]
    Knorr E M, Raymond T Ng, (1998), “Algorithms for Mining Distance-Based Outliers in Large Datasets”, Proceedings of the 24th VLSB Conference New York, USA.Google Scholar
  16. [16]
    Bykat A, (1978), “Convex Hull of a finite set of points in two dimensions”, Inf. Process. Lett. 7, 296–298.MathSciNetCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Parmee I C, Abraham J A R, (2003), “Further Developments of the Interactive Evolutionary Design System-Towards a better understanding of variable and objective space through interactive exploration”. Interactive Evolutionary Computation, Series of Workshops at the Genetic and Evolutionary Computing Conference (GECCO), http://www.ad-comtech.co.uk/Workshops.htmGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    Deb K, (2001), “Multi Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms”, John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    Zitzler E, Deb K, Thiele L, (2000), “Comparison of Multi Objective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results”, Evolutionary Computation, 8(2), pp: 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    Ziztler E, Laumanns M, Thiele L, (2002), “SPEA-II: Improving the Strength Pareto Evolutionary Algorithm for Multi Objective Optimisation”, Evolutionary Methods for Design Optimisation and Control, CIMNE, Barcelona, Spain, pg 95–100.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag London 2004

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. A. R Abraham
    • 1
  • I. C. Parmee
    • 1
  1. 1.Advanced Computation in Design and Decision-making (ACDDM)University of the West of EnglandBristol

Personalised recommendations