Abstract
Many aircraft components are designed from monolithic structures to reduce manufacturing cost, reduce weight, and increase stiffness. To enable machining of such structures it is necessary to perform high-speed machining that can remove a large amount of material within a shorter time. However, the performance of high speed-machining operations is limited by the static and dynamic stiffness of the tool and part, which can cause problems such as regenerative chatter and push-off.
The tool path plays a key role in avoiding these problems as it helps to minimise the workpiece vibration during machining. This work aims to optimise the tool path by simulating the removal of material in a finite element environment, which is controlled by a Genetic Algorithm. To simulate the physical removal of material during machining, a finite element model is designed to represent a thin walled workpiece. The target was to reduce the deflection after each element was removed, according to the sequence suggested by the Genetic Algorithm.
As a first step, a cantilever beam is created, meshed and numbered. There are 6 elements to remove, representing the tool path sequence for a physical machining process. A Genetic Algorithm was used to find the element removal sequence that gave the greatest workpiece stiffness in the cutting region. It is concluded that tool path optimisation can be performed successfully by the proposed technique.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Tlusty, “Manufacturing processes and equipment.” Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2000, pp. 559–604.
D. Montgomery and Y. Atlintas, “Mechanism of cutting force and surface generation in dynamic milling,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, vol. 113, pp. 160–168, 1991.
J. Tlusty, “Dynamics of High-Speed Milling,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, pp. 59–67, 1986.
S. Smith and D. Dvorak, “Tool path strategies for high speed milling aluminum workpieces with thin webs,” Mechatronics, vol. 8, pp. 291–300, 1998.
M. Monreal and C. A. Rodriguez, “Influence of tool path strategy on the cycle time of high-speed milling,” Computer-Aided Design, vol. 35, pp. 395–401, 2003.
V. Tandon, H. El-Mounayri, and H. Kishawy, “NC end milling optimization using evolutionary computation,” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, vol. 42, pp. 595–605, 2002.
S. S. Rao, “Mechanical vibrations.” Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, 2004, pp. 236.
S. Smith and J. Tlusty, “An overview of modelling and simulation of the milling process,” Journal of Engineering for Industry, vol. 113, pp. 169–175, 1991.
E. Goldberg David, Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Reading: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co, 1989.
J. E. Baker, “Reducing bias and inefficiency in the selection algorithm,” Proceedings of the second international conference on Genetic Algorithms, pp. 14–21, 1987.
Z. Michalewicz, “Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs.” Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1992, pp. 165–192.
M. Mitchell, An introduction to genetic algorithms. Cambridge, London: MIT Press, 1996.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Springer-Verlag London
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ariffin, M.K.A.M., Sims, N.D., Worden, K. (2004). Genetic Optimisation of Machine Tool Paths. In: Parmee, I.C. (eds) Adaptive Computing in Design and Manufacture VI. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-338-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-338-1_11
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-85233-829-9
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-338-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive