Advertisement

e-Maintenance: a means to high overall efficiency

  • Erkki Jantunen
  • Eduardo Gilabert
  • Christos Emmanoulidis
  • Adam Adgar

Abstract

Today the number of industries putting emphasis on maximising Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) is rapidly increasing. Instead of looking only at one aspect of production, modern enterprises seek to plant a series of joint activities, aimed at minimising losses, by improving on Performance, Quality and Availability at the same time. Emphasising these three factors simultaneously leads to the introduction of efficient maintenance, including sound strategies, such as Condition Based Maintenance (CBM). The incorporation of key enabling technologies within a Condition Based Maintenance strategy, such as wireless networking, internet & mobile computing, minature sensing devices and location awareness, has paved the way to the introduction of e-Maintenance. The paper looks at the key features pertaining to the successful implementation of e-Maintenance into modern industry. It then highlights steps taken towards the design and implementation of an e-Maintenance architecture within the EU Integrated Project ‘Dynamite’. The paper concludes with a discussion on current challenges and future prospects of e-Maintenance.

Keywords

Condition Monitoring Maintenance Strategy Remain Useful Life Maintenance Management Maintenance Engineer 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Jantunen E., Arnaiz A., Emmanoulidis C., Iung B. & Adgar A. (2009) Räjäyttääkö Dynamiitti kunnossapidon?, ProMaint No. 3 (in Finnish)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Pinjala, S.K., Pintelon, L. & Vereecke, A. (2006) An empirical investigation on the relationship between business and maintenance strategies. International Journal of Production Economics, Volume 104, Issue 1, pp 214-229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lee, J. (2004) Infotronics-based intelligent maintenance system and its impact on closed-loop product life cycle systems. Proc. Int. Conf. on Intelligent Maintenance Systems, Arles, France, 15–17 July.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Halme J., (2008) Online lube sensing technologies for condition monitoring, BRIDGE-DYNAMITE-PROMISE Training workshop, Lausanne, Switzerland, 18th-20th February, 2008Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gorritxategi E., Terradillos J., Aranzabe A., Arnaiz A. & Aranzabe E., (2008) Novel Method for Lube Quality Status Assessment Based on Visible Spectrometric Analysis, Lubrication Management and Technology (Lubmat). San Sebastian ISBN 978-84-932064-5-1Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arnaiz A. Iung B., Jantunen E., Levat E., Gilabert E. (2007) DYNAWeb. A web platform for flexible provision of emaintenance services. Harrogate.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Adgar A., Addison J.F.D. & Yau, C-Y , (2007) Applications of RFID Technology in Maintenance Systems, Proceedings of the second World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM) June 2007 Harrogate, UK.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gilabert E., Ferreiro S. & Arnaiz A.,(2007) Web Services System for Distributed Technology Upgrade Within an e-Maintenance Framework" OTM 2007 Ws. Part I, R. Meersman, Z. Tari, P. Herrero et al. (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Computing Science (LNCS) 4805, pp. 14Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arnaiz A., Jantunen E., Adgar A. & Gilabert E., (2009) Ubiquitous computing for dynamic condition based maintenance, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering (JQME), Special issue on Condition Monitoring and ICT application - volume 15, issue 2 In printGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bengtsson M. (2003) Standardization issues in condition based maintenance, Department of Innovation, Design and Product Development, Mälardalen University, Sweden.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lebold M., Reichard K., S.Byington C., Orsagh R (2002) “OSA-CBM Architecture Development with Emphasis on XML Implementations” MARCON 2002.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gilabert E., Arnaiz A. (2006) Intelligent automation systems for predictive maintenance. A case study. Robotics and Computer Integrated Manufacturing (RCIM). Vol 22. (5-6), 543-549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Levrat E., Iung B. & Crespo Marquez A. (2008) e-Maintenance: review and conceptual framework. Production Planning & Control, 19( 4):408–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Arnaiz A., Jantunen E., Emmanoulidis C. & Iung B., (2006) Mobile Maintenance Management, Journal of International Technology and Information Management – JITIM 154, 11-22. ISBN:1063-519XGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Campos J., Jantunen E. & Prakash O., Mobile Maintenance Decision Support System, Maintenance and Asset Management Journal, 23(2), 42-48Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Emmanouilidis, C., (2008) Current trends in maintenance e-training and m-training, CM2008 & MFPT2008, The Fifth International Conference on Condition Monitoting and Machinery Failure Prevention Technologies, 15-18 July 2008, Edinburgh, UK.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Emmanouilidis, C, Katsikas, S and Giordamlis, C., (2008) Wireless Condition Monitoring and Maintenance Management: A Review and a Novel Application Development Platform, Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and Intelligent Maintenance Systems Conference (WCEAM-IMS 2008) 27 – 30 October 2008, Beijing International Convention Center, Beijing, China, pp. 2030-2041.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erkki Jantunen
    • 1
  • Eduardo Gilabert
    • 2
  • Christos Emmanoulidis
    • 3
  • Adam Adgar
    • 4
  1. 1.VTT Technical Research Centre of FinlandVTTFinland
  2. 2.Fundación TeknikerEibarSpain
  3. 3.CETI/R.C.AthenaXanthiGreece
  4. 4.School of Science and TechnologyUniversity of TeessideMiddlesbroughUK

Personalised recommendations