A case study of reliability assessment for centrifugal pumps in a petrochemical plant

  • Masdi Muhammad
  • M Amin Abd Majid
  • Nurul Akma Ibrahim


Centrifugal pumps are widely used in petrochemical industry and in some instances, the number of pumps used could easily amount to hundreds of pumps in a typical petrochemical plant. Consequently, the reliability of these pumps essentially translates into stable and reliable plant operation as the pumps performances are critical in ensuring continuous plant productivity. Reliability assessment for repairable equipment, which in this case centrifugal pumps, is highly dependent upon the assumption of the state after each repair. The post repair states can be categorized into three different states namely, ‘as good as new’, ‘as bad as old’ and the states in between. In practice, however, the usual state of equipment after repair follows the state of ‘better than old but worse than new’ which lies somewhere in between the two extremes. This paper focuses on the reliability assessment of the centrifugal pumps at a refinery plant that has been in operation for more than 10 years using a more robust process called generalized renewal process (GRP). This process has been proposed to model not only the ‘inbetween’ states but also the two extreme post repair states. A case study utilizing centrifugal pump failure data is used as a comparative appraisal of reliability assessment between GRP, perfect renewal process (PRP) and non-homogenous Poisson process (NHPP). The underlying distribution for time to first failure for these pumps is assumed to follow the two-parameter Weibull distribution and the parameters for the models are estimated using maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). The GRP solution based on the case study showed better description of the failure distribution even with limited available failure data in contrast with other assumptions as indicated by the likelihood values.


Monte Carlo Repairable System Centrifugal Pump Repair Action Failure Data 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ascher, H. & Feingold, H. (1984) Repairable systems reliability: Modeling, inference, misconceptions and their causes. Marcel Dekker, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Veber, B., Nagode, M. & Fajdiga, M. (2008) Generalized renewal process for repairable systems based on finite Weibull mixture. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 93, 1461-1472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Krivtsov, V. V. (2007) Recent advances in theory and applications of stochastic point process models in reliability engineering. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 549-551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Krivtsov, V. V. (2007) Practical extensions to NHPP application in repairable system reliability analysis. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 92, 560-562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yanez, M., Joglar, F. & Modarres, M. (2002) Generalized renewal process for analysis of repairable system with limited failure experience. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 77, 167-180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kijima, M. & Sumita, N. (1986) A useful generalization of renewal theory: counting process governed by non-negative Markovian increments. Journal Applied Probability, 23, 71-88.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mettas, A. & Zhao, W. (2005) Modeling and analysis of repairable system with general repair. IEEE 2005 Proceedings annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium,Alexandaria, Virginia USA, January 24-27.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Krivtsov, V. (2000) Monte Carlo approach to modeling and estimation of the generalized renewal process in repairable system reliability analysis. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Weckman, G. R., Shell, R. L. & Marvel, J. H. (2001) Modeling the reliability of repairable systems in aviation industry. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 40, 51-63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Masdi Muhammad
    • 1
  • M Amin Abd Majid
    • 1
  • Nurul Akma Ibrahim
    • 1
  1. 1.University Technology PetronasBandar Seri IskandarMalaysia

Personalised recommendations