Advertisement

Integrated strategic asset performance assessment

  • Aditya Parida
  • Uday Kumar
Conference paper

Abstract

Asset performance assessment forms an integral part of a business process for heavy and capital intensive industry to ensure performance assurance. Managing the asset performance is critical for long term economic and business viability. Assessing the asset performance is a complex issue as it involves multiple inputs and outputs; and various stakeholders’ dynamic requirements. Lack of integration among various stakeholders and their changing requirements in strategic asset performance assessment is still a problem for the companies. It is a challenge to integrate a whole organization, where free flow and transparency of information is possible; and each process is linked to integrate to achieve the company’s business goals. In this paper, various issues associated with an integrated strategic asset performance assessment are discussed.

Keywords

Customer Satisfaction Corporate Strategy Performance Measurement System Strategic Level Balance Scorecard 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Antti Lönnqvist. (2004) Business Performance Measurement for Knowledge-Intensive Organizations, http://www.pmteam.tut.fi/julkaisut/HK.pdf, visited on 2004 Aug 22.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Toran, F., Ramirez, D., Casan, S., E. Navarro, A and Pelegri, J., (2000) Instrumentation and Measurement Technology, Vol. 2 (Ed. IEEE) IMTC, pp. 652-656Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kaplan, R. S and Norton, D. P, (2004) Strategy maps, converting intangible assets intangible outcomes, Harvard Business School Press, USAGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Liyanage, J. P. and Kumar, U. (2003) Towards a value-based view on operations and maintenance performance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering,Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mather, D (2005), An introduction to maintenance scorecard, The plant maintenance News letter edition 52, dated 13 April 2005.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jelassi, T. and Enders, A. (2005) Strategies for e-business, Prentice Hall, Essex, LondonGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parida, A, Ahren, T and Kumar, U. (2003) Integrating Maintenance Performance with Corporate Balanced Scorecard, COMADEM 2003, Proceedings of the 16th International Congress, 27-29 August 2003, Växjö, Sweden, pp. 53-59.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kaplan, R. S and Norton, D. P (1996) The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press, pp. 322.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kutucuoglu, K. Y; Hamali, J; Irani, J; Sharp, J. M (2001) A framework for managing maintenance using performance measurement systems, International Journal of Operation and Production Management, Vol. 21, No. ½, pp. 173-194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Eccles, R. G. (1991) The performance measurement manifesto, Harvard Business Review, January-February, pp. 131-137.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Murthy, D. N. P, Atrens, A. and Eccleston, J. A. (2002) Strategic maintenance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 4, pp. 287-305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Parida, A. and Chattopadhyay, G. (2007) Development of Multi-Criteria Hierarchical framework for Maintenance Performance Measurement (MPM). Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp 241-258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tsang, A. H. C. (1998) A strategic approach to managing maintenance performance, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, Vol.4, No. 2, pp.87-94 Vol. 9, pp. 333-350.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Thompson, J. L. (1997) Lead with Vision: manage the strategic challenge, International Thompson Business Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Parida, A (2006) Development of Multi-criteria Hierarchical Framework for Maintenance Performance Measurement: Concepts, Issues and Challenges, Doctoral thesis, Luleå University of Technology, Sweden, http://epubl.ltu.se/1402-1544/2006/37/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lingle, J. H. and Schiemann, W. A. (1996) From balanced scorecard to strategy gauge: Is measurement worth it?” Management Review, March, pp. 56-62.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aditya Parida
    • 1
  • Uday Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Operation and Maintenance EngineeringLuleå University of TechnologyLuleåSweden

Personalised recommendations