Skip to main content

Performance of public private partnerships: An evolutionary perspective

  • Conference paper
Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management
  • 4795 Accesses

Abstract

PPPs are held to be a powerful way of mobilising private finance and resources to deliver public infrastructure. Theoretically, research into procurement has begun to acknowledge difficulties with the classification and assessment of different types of procurement, particularly those which do not sufficiently acknowledge variety within specific types of procurement methods. This paper advances a theoretical framework based on an evolutionary economic conceptualisation of a routine, which can accommodate the variety evident in procurement projects, in particular PPPs. The paper tests how the various elements of a PPP, as advanced in the theoretical framework, affect performance across 10 case studies. It concludes, that a limited number of elements of a PPP affect their performance, and provides strong evidence for the theoretical model advanced in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Duffield, C., P. Raisbeck, and M. Xu, Benchmarking Study, Phase II. Report on the performance of PPP projects in Australia when compared with a representative sample of traditionally procured infrastructure projects. . 2008, National PPP Forum Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chan, C., et al., Public Infrastructure Financing: An International Perspective, A.G.P. Commission, Editor. 2009, Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  3. Vining, A.R. and A.E. Boardman, public-private partnership in Canada: Theory and evidence. Canadian Public Administration / Administration Publiqiue du Canada, 2008. 51(1): p. 9-44.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tookey, J.E., et al., Construction procurement routes: re-defining the contours of construction procurement. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2001. 8(1): p. 20-30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nelson, R.R. and S.G. Winter, An evolutionary theory of economic change. 1982, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Feldman, M.S., Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organization Science, 2000. 11(6): p. 611-629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Feldman, M.S., A performative perspective on stability and change in organizational routines. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2003. 12(4): p. 727-752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker, M.C., Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2004. 13(4): p. 643-677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kauffman, S.A., The Origins of Order: Self-Organisation and Selection in Evolution 1993, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kauffman, S.A., At home in the universe: The search for the laws of Self-Organization and Complexity 1995, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Becker, M.C., T. Knudsen, and J.G. March, Schumpeter, Winter, and the sources of novelty. Industrial and Corporate Change, 2006. 15(2): p. 353–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Winter, S., Optimization and evolution in the theory of the firm, in Adaptive Economic Models, R.H. Day and T. Groves, Editors. 1975, Academic Press: New York. p. 73-118.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rivkin, J.W. and N. Siggelkow, Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design. Management Science, 2003. 49(3): p. 290-311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Levinthal, D.A., Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 1997. 43: p. 319-340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Levinthal, D.A. and M. Warglien, Landscape design: Design for Local Action in Complex Worlds Organization Science, 1999. 10(3): p. 342-357.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Holland, J.H., Hidden Order: How adaptation builds complexity. . 1995, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Gell-Man, M., Complex Adaptive Systems, in The Mind, The Brain, and Complex Adaptive Systems, H. Morowitz and J.L. Singer, Editors. 1994, Westview Press: Santa Fe. p. 11-24.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pentland, B.T., Conceptualising and measuring variety in the execution of organizational work processes. Management Science, 2003. 49(7): p. 857-870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Globerman, S. and A. Vining, A Framework for Evaluating the Government Contracting-Out Decision with an Application to Information Technology Public Administration Review, 1996. 56(6): p. 557-586.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vining, A. and S. Globerman, A Conceptual Framework for Understanding the Outsourcing Decision. European Management Journal, 1999. 17(6): p. 645-654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chan, A.P.C. and A.P.L. Chan, Key performance indicators for measuring construction success. Benchmarking: An international journal, 2004. 11(2): p. 203-221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coase, R.H., The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 1937. 4(16): p. 386-405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Osbourne, S.P. and K.A. Brown, Managing change and innovation in public service organizations. 2005, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Stake, R.E., Qualitative case studies, in The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods, N. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, Editors. 2005, Sage: Thousand Oaks. p. 443-466.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Becker, M.C., The concept of routines: some clarifications. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 2005. 29: p. 249-262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Babbie, E., The practice of social research. 10th ed. 2004, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eisenhardt, K.M., Building theories from case study research, in The Qualitative Researcher’s Companion, A.M. Huberman and M.B. Miles, Editors. 2002, Sage Publications: Thousand Oaks. p. 5–31.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yin, R.K., Case Study research: Design and Methods. 3rd ed. 2003, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Eisenhardt, K.M., Better stories and better constructs: The case for rigor and comparative logic. Academy of Management Review, 1991. 16(3): p. 620-627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Stake, R.E., Case studies, in Strategies of Qualitative Enquiry, N. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln, Editors. 2003, Thousand Oaks: Sage. p. 134 - 164.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lee, T.W., Using qualitative methods in organizational research. 1999, Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cresswell, J.W., Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among five approaches. 2nd ed. 2007, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  33. NSW Government, Working with Government: Risk Allocation and Commercial Principles, N. Treasury, Editor. 2007, NSW Government Sydney.http://www.treasury.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/3135/risk_allocation.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  34. Deloitte, Closing the Infrastructure Gap: The Role of Public-Private Partnerships. 2006, Deloitte Research: NPD.http://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/files/Closing_the_Infrastructure_Gap-The_role_of_PPPs_Deloitte_2006.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  35. Infrastructure Australia, National Public Private Partnership Guidelines. 2008, Australian Government Canberra.http://www.infrastructureaustralia.gov.au/files/National_PPP_Guidelines-Vol_4_PSC_Guidance_Dec_08.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  36. Furneaux, C.W. and K.A. Brown, Capabilities, institutions and markets: A cross jurisdictional analysis of embedded public values in public works procurement in Australia, in Infrastructure Policies and Public Value panel track, International Research Symposium on Public Management XI. 2007: Potsdam (Germany)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag

About this paper

Cite this paper

Furneaux, C., Brown, K., Tywoniak, S., Gudmundsson, A. (2010). Performance of public private partnerships: An evolutionary perspective. In: Kiritsis, D., Emmanouilidis, C., Koronios, A., Mathew, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_38

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-321-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-320-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics