Strategies for integrating maintenance for sustainable manufacturing

  • Jayantha P. Liyanage
  • Fazleena Badurdeen


With the changes in economical, social, political, and environmental conditions around industrial activities, sustainable manufacturing gradually emerges as the way to do business in the immediate future. Many global manufacturing giants appear to have embraced the idea, yet are in need of novel solutions and methods that can be capitalized. So far, attention is largely paid on the technological innovation. However, quite much can be done with internal processes such as operations & maintenance to achieve sustainability in the manufacturing cluster. Maintenance in particular has not been in the centre of focus, which can mostly be attributable to the conventional wisdom of the industry. The manufacturing industry is in need of an understanding of the principal strategies exploitable for maintenance integration in different scales. This paper discuses three such strategies from three different perspectives, namely technical, life-cycle, and organizational. It argues that in order to truly integrate maintenance the classical reliability-based approaches are inadequate to make the business case, and that sustainable manufacturing is in an immediate need for novel risk-based applications.


Product Lifecycle Management Sustainable Manufacturing Equipment Selection Lifecycle Stage Maintenance Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Badurdeen F, Iyengar D, Goldsby TJ, Jawahir IS, Metta H & Gupta S. (2009) Extending Total Lifecycle Thinking to Sustainable Supply Chain Design. International Journal of Product Lifecycle Management. Under Review.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Elkington J. (1998) Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of the 21st Century Business, USA: New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jawahir IS. (2008) Beyond the 3R’s: 6R Sustainability Concepts for Next Generation Manufacturing. Keynote paper presented at IIT MMAE Symposium on Sustainability and Product Development, August 7-8, 2008.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joshi K, Venkatachalam A, Jaafar IH & Jawahir IS. (2006) A new methodology for transforming 3R Concept into 6R Concept for Improved Product Sustainability. Global Conference on Sustainable Product Development and Life Cycle Engineering, October 2006. Sao Paulo, Brazil.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jovane, F., Yoshikawa, H., (2008) The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing, CIRP Annals – Manufactuyirng technology, 57, pp 641-659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Liyanage, J.P., (2003), Operations and maintenance performance in oil and gas production assets: Theoretical architecture and Capital value theory in perspective, PhD Thesis, Faculty of Engineering Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Science & Technology, Norway.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Liyanage, J.P., Kumar, U., (2003) Towards a value based view on operations and maintenance performance management, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol.9, no.4, pp 333-350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liyanage, J.P., (2006) Sustainability risk management: Managing business risk in complex environments through systematic operations and maintenance performance specifications, 18th European Maintenance Congress: Euromaintenance 2006, Basel, Switzerland, pp 677-682.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liyanage, J.P., (2007) Operations and maintenance performance in production and manufacturing assets: The sustainability perspective, Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Emerald, 18(3&4), pp 304-314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Liyanage, J.P., Badurdeen, F., Ratnayake, R.M.C., (2009) Asset maintenance and Sustainability risk, Duffuaa, S.O. (ed.), Handbook on Maintenance engineering and management, Springer. (accepted) Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    McDonough W & Braungart M. (2002) Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. North Point Press.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paz, N.M. and Leigh, W. (1994), Maintenance scheduling: issues, results and research needs, International Journal of Operations and Production Management, Vol. 14, No. 8, pp. 47-69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    UNCED (1992) Agenda 21. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development. ( Scholar
  14. 14.
    UNWCED (1987) Our Common Future. United Nations World Commission on Environment and Development: UK: Oxford Publishers.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    USEPA (2008) Municipal Solid Waste (MSW) – Reduce, Reuse, and Recycle. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jayantha P. Liyanage
    • 1
  • Fazleena Badurdeen
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Industrial Asset Management (CIAM)University of StavangerStavangerNorway
  2. 2.Centre for Manufacturing and Department of Mechanical Engineering, College of EngineeringUniversity of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations