Advertisement

The House of Maintenance - Identifying the potential for improvement in internal maintenance organizations by means of a capability maturity model

  • Guenther Schuh
  • Bert Lorenz
  • Cord-Philipp Winter
  • Gerhard Gudergan

Abstract

In order to guarantee an efficient and effective employment of production equipment, it is essential to identify any possible potential for improving performance, not only in the production process, but also in supporting areas such as maintenance. One of the major tasks in increasing maintenance performance consists of systematically identifying the company’s most significant weaknesses in maintenance organisation and thus being able to implement improvements there where they are most needed. But how is a company to tackle this important task? To answer this question, this paper describes an assessment and improvement approach, based on a capability maturity model (CMM). By means of this approach, the status-quo of a maintenance organisation can be analysed and its individual improvement opportunities identified.

Keywords

Maintenance Policy Maintenance Management Capability Maturity Model Performance Management System Maintenance Performance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Schuh G., Berbner J., Lorenz B., Franzkoch B. & Winter C.-P., (2008) Reliability leads to a better performance – results of an international survey in continuous process industries. Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and Intelligent Maintenance Systems (WCEAM-IMS 2008), 1366-1374, Springer-Verlag London Ltd. Beijing.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shirose K. (2007) Total Productive Maintenance. New Implementation Program in Fabrication and Assembly Industries. Seventh edition. JIPM-Solutions. Tokyo.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Moubray J. (1997) Reliability-Centered Maintenance. Second edition. Industrial Press Inc. New York.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McKone K. E., Schroeder R. G. Cua K. O. (2001) The impact of total productive maintenance practices on Manufacturing performance. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 19, 39-58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan F. I., Haddara M., Krishnasamy L. (2008) A new Methodology for Risk-Based Availability Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, Vol. 57, No. 1, 103-112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Schick E. (2004) unpublished Expert Study “Trends and Development-Perspectives in Maintenance” conducted by the Research Institute for Operations Management at RWTH Aachen University (FIR).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mark C. Paulk, Charles V. Weber, Bill Curtis & Mary Beth Chrissis (1994). The Capability Model: Guidelines for improving the software process (SEI Series in Software Engineering). Addison-Wesley Professional. Boston.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marquez A. C. (2007) The Maintenance Management Framework: Models and Methods for Complex Systems Maintenance (Springer Series in Reliability Engineering). Springer-Verlag. Berlin.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moore R. (2004) Making Common Sence – common practice: Models for Manufacturing Excellence. Third edition. Butterworth-Heinemann. Oxford.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Al Najar B., Asyouf I. (2000) Improving effectiveness of manufacturing systems using total quality maintenance. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 11, No. 4, 267-276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carrizosa E., Messine F. (2007) An exact global optimization method for deriving weights from pairwise comparison matrices. Journal of Global Optimization, Vol. 38, No. 2, 237-247.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lorenz B., Winter C. (2008) Identification of Optimal Maintenance Strategy Mixes for Small and Medium Enterprises (SME). Euromaintenance Papers. Bemas. Brussels.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guenther Schuh
    • 1
  • Bert Lorenz
    • 1
  • Cord-Philipp Winter
    • 1
  • Gerhard Gudergan
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Operations Management at RWTH Aachen University (FIR)AachenGermany

Personalised recommendations