Abstract
This paper reports on findings from the first stage of an exploratory study into the factors that influence the diffusion of ontologies in the Road Asset Management sector in Australia. The study investigates issues related to the diffusion of standard information models (taxonomies, road classifications and hierarchies, as well as various information systems conceptual schemas) in Road Asset Management. Individual and group interviews were conducted with 14 industry experts in four South Australian road authorities at state and local government level. The qualitative analysis of the findings is based on the preliminary HTE (human, technology, environment) conceptual model [1]. The findings suggest that the diffusion of standard information models at industry level is a complex process that combines human characteristics with technology and environment characteristics.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Nastasie, D.L., A. Koronios, and K. Sandhu. (2008) Factors Influencing the Diffusion of Ontologies in Road Asset Management-A Preliminary Conceptual Model. in Proceedings of the 3rd World Congress on Engineering Asset Management and Intelligent Maintenance Systems (WCEAM-IMS). Beijing, China: Springer-Verlag London Ltd.
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development), (2008) OECD Information Technology Outlook 2008: Highlights.
Daconta, M.C., L.J. Obrst, and K.T. Smith, (2003) The Semantic Web: a guide to the future of XML, Web services, and knowledge management. 1st ed. Indianapolis, Ind. : Wiley Publishing, Inc.
Hepp, M. and J. de Bruijn, (2007) GenTax: A Generic Methodology for Deriving OWL and RDF-S Ontologies from Hierarchical Classifications, Thesauri, and Inconsistent Taxonomies, in The Semantic Web: Research and Applications. p. 129-144.
Nastasie, D.L. and A. Koronios, (2009) The Role of Standard Information Models In Road Asset Management, in Fourth World Congress on Engineering Asset Management (WCEAM), Springer-Verlag London Ltd.: Athens, Greece.
Austroads. (2009) Asset Management - FAQ. [cited 2009 01 April]; Available from: http://www.austroads.com.au/asset/faq.html.
Australian Government-Productivity Commission, (2008) Assessing Local Government Revenue Raising Capacity-Research Report. Canberra.
Markus, M.L., C.W. Steinfield, and R.T. Wigand, (2003) The Evolution of Vertical IS Standards: Electronic Interchange Standards in the US Home Mortgage Industry, in ICIS 2003 MISQ Special Issue Workshop on Standards.
Markus, M.L., et al., (2006) Industry-Wide Information Systems Standardization as Collective Action: The Case of the U.S. Residential Mortgage Industry. MIS Quarterly, 30, 439-465.
Wigand, R.T., C.W. Steinfield, and M.L. Markus, (2005) Information Technology Standards Choices and Industry Structure Outcomes: The Case of the U.S. Home Mortgage Industry. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 165-191.
Koronios, A., et al., (2007) Integration Through Standards – an Overview of International Standards for Engineering Asset Management, in Second World Congress on Engineering Asset Management, 11-14 June 2007. Harrogate, United Kingdom.
Katz, M.L. and C. Shapiro, (1986) Technology Adoption in the Presence of Network Externalities. Journal of Political Economy, 94(4), 822.
Rogers, E.M., (2003) Diffusion of innovations. 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
Tornatzky, L.G. and M. Fleischer, (1990) The Processes of Technological Innovation. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
Davis, F.D., (1989) Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 318-340.
Davis, F.D., R.P. Bagozzi, and P.R. Warshaw, (1989) User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Weiss, M. and C. Cargill, (1992) Consortia in the Standards Development Process. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 43(8), 559-565.
Kindleberger, C.P., (1983) Standards as Public, Collective and Private Goods. Kyklos, 36(3), 377.
Skuce, D., (1997) How We Might Reach Agreement on Shared Ontologies: A Fundamental Approach in AAAI Technical Report SS-97-06. University of Ottawa.
Laera, L., et al., (2006) Reaching Agreement over Ontology Alignments, in The Semantic Web - ISWC 2006. 371-384.
Hepp, M., (2007) Possible Ontologies: How Reality Constrains the Development of Relevant Ontologies. Internet Computing, IEEE, 11(1), 90-96.
Markus, M.L., (2002) Power, Politics and MIS Implementation, in Qualitative research in information systems : a reader, M.D. Myers and D. Avison, Editors. SAGE Publications: London. 19-48.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer-Verlag
About this paper
Cite this paper
Nastasie, D., Koronios, A. (2010). The diffusion of standard information models in road asset management - A study based on the human-technology-environment model. In: Kiritsis, D., Emmanouilidis, C., Koronios, A., Mathew, J. (eds) Engineering Asset Lifecycle Management. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-320-6_22
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-85729-321-3
Online ISBN: 978-0-85729-320-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)