A model for more accurate maintenance decisions

  • Basim Al-Najjar
  • Renato Ciganovic
Conference paper


It is usual when using CM technology for assessing the state of a component and planning maintenance actions using predetermined levels for warnings and replacements. The replacement of a damaged component is usually done at lower or higher than the predetermined level, which both means losses. This is because the probability of doing replacements just at the predetermined level is negligibly small. The accuracy in the assessment of the condition of a component has big technical and economic impact on the output of the machine, production process and consequently company profitability and competitiveness. The higher the accuracy in assessing the condition of a component yields higher probability of avoiding failures and planning maintenance actions at low costs. In this paper, techniques for assessing the state of a component using both mechanistic and other statistical approaches are considered. This paper also applies Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) Chart for identifying the time of damage initiation and reducing false alarms. Techniques for assessing the probability of failure of a component and its residual life, and predicting the vibration level at the next planned measuring opportunity or planned stoppage are introduced, discussed, computerised and tested. The problem addressed is: How is it possible to increase the accuracy of assessing the condition of a component? The major result achieved is; development of a model for more accurate assessment of the condition of a component/equipment through combining different approaches. The main conclusion that can be drawn is; applying the model, it is possible to enhance the accuracy of assessment of the condition of a component/equipment and consequently maintenance decision since the integrated model provides comprehensive and relevant information in one platform.


False Alarm Maintenance Action Residual Life Vibration Level Vibration Measurement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Al-Najjar, B. (1997) Condition-based maintenance: Selection and improvement of a cost-effective vibration-based policy in rolling element bearings. Doctoral thesis, ISSN 0280-722X, ISRN LUTMDN/TMIO—1006—SE, ISBN 91-628-2545-X, LundGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    University, Inst. of Industrial Engineering, Sweden.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Al-Najjar, B. (2000) Accuracy, effectiveness and improvement of Vibration-based Maintenance in Paper Mills; Case Studies. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 229(2), 389-410.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Al-Najjar, B. (2001) Prediction of the vibration level when monitoring rolling element bearings in paper mill machines. International Journal of COMADEM 4(2), 19-27.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Najjar, B. (2003) Total Time on Test, TTT-plots for condition monitoring of rolling element bearings in paper mills. International Journal of COMADEM 6(2), 27-32.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Najjar, Basim (2007A) The Lack of Maintenance and not Maintenance which Costs: A Model to Describe and Quantify the Impact of Vibration-based Maintenance on Company's Business. International Journal of Production Economics IJPPM 55(8).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Al-Najjar, Basim (2007B) Establishing and running a condition-based maintenance policy; Applied example of vibrationbased maintenance. WCEAM2007, 106-115, 12-14 June Harrogate, UKGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bergman, B. (1977) Some graphical methods for maintenance planing. Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, 467-471.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bergman, B.and Klefsjö, B. (1995) Quality from customer needs to customer satisfaction. Studentl., Lund, Sweden.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herraty, A.G. (1993) Bearing vibration-Failures and diagnosis. Mining Technoloy, 51-53.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jardine, A.K.S. and Joseph, T. and Banjevic, D. (1999) Optimizing condition-based maintenance decisions for equipment subject to vibration monitoring, Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 5(3), 192-202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lin, C. and Tseng, H. (2005) A neural network application for reliability modelling and condition-based predictive maintenance. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 25(1), 174-179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Xiaodong, Z. and Xu, R. and Chiman, K. and Liang, S.Y. and Qiulin, X. and Haynes, L. (2005) An integrated approach to bearing fault diagnostics and prognostics, American Control Conference, 2005. Proceedings of the 2005, 2750-2755.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, W. (2002) A model to predict the residual life of rolling element bearings given monitored condition information to date. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics, 13(1), 3-16.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wang, W. and Zhang, W. (2007) An asset residual life prediction model based on expert judgments, European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 496-505.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    White, Glenn (1996) Maskinvibration, Vibrationsteori och principer för tillståndskontroll, Landskrona: Diatek vibrationsteknikGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wu, S. and Gebraeel, N. and Lawley, M. A. and Yih, Y. (2007) A Neural Network Integrated Decision Support System for Condition-Based Optimal Predictive Maintenance Policy, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 37(2), 226-236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Basim Al-Najjar
    • 1
  • Renato Ciganovic
    • 1
  1. 1.School for Technology and DesignVäxjö UniversityVäxjöSweden

Personalised recommendations